Connect
MJA
MJA

Treating adults with acute stress disorder and post-traumatic stress disorder in general practice: a clinical update

David Forbes, Mark C Creamer, Andrea J Phelps, Anne-Laure Couineau, John A Cooper, Richard A Bryant, Alexander C McFarlane, Grant J Devilly, Lynda R Matthews and Beverley Raphael
Med J Aust 2007; 187 (2): 120-123. || doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2007.tb01158.x
Published online: 16 July 2007

In Australia, about 65% of men and 50% of women are exposed to a potentially traumatic event in their lifetime.1,2 Examples of traumatic events include assault and sexual assault, transport accidents, war, and natural disasters. A degree of psychological distress is common in the early aftermath of such traumatic exposure, but when distress persists and interferes with psychosocial functioning, a diagnosis of acute stress disorder (ASD) or post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) should be considered. Features of PTSD are shown in Box 1.

The estimated 12-month prevalence of PTSD in the Australian general population is 1.3%, representing around 200 000 cases in any one year, and the lifetime prevalence rate (the percentage of people who are diagnosed with the disorder in their lifetime) is likely to be about double this figure.1

While a diagnosis of PTSD requires that the symptoms be present for at least a month, ASD is diagnosed between 2 days and 1 month after a traumatic event. There is significant overlap in the diagnostic criteria for these conditions. The diagnoses differ in that ASD requires the experience of several dissociative symptoms not included in PTSD (such as detachment, reduced awareness of surroundings and depersonalisation), while PTSD places greater emphasis on avoidance symptoms by requiring at least three (such as avoidance of thoughts and feelings about the trauma, avoidance of activities, places or people that may act as reminders of the trauma, and passive avoidance symptoms such as emotional numbing and detachment). A growing body of evidence indicates that people with ASD are at high risk of developing PTSD.4 However, primarily because of the emphasis on dissociative symptoms, about half of people with PTSD do not meet ASD criteria in the first month after trauma.

In most patients, PTSD is unlikely to present as a stand-alone problem. Comorbid conditions, including depression, other anxiety disorders, and substance misuse, are common. Associated problems include relationship difficulties, excessive anger, and occupational impairment.

The clinical recommendations in this article are based on the recently released evidence-based Australian guidelines for the treatment of adults with acute stress disorder and posttraumatic stress disorder5 and the United Kingdom PTSD guidelines.6

Screening and assessment in general practice

Traumatic stress problems present to general practitioners in a variety of ways. Sometimes patients present with expressed concern about their emotional wellbeing after exposure to a traumatic stressor, and may directly report specific symptoms of ASD or PTSD. Such presentations are more common after a recent discrete trauma, such as a motor vehicle accident or an assault. Other patients may present with a greater focus on related problems, such as substance misuse, depression or a specific phobic reaction (such as fear of driving). In such cases, the link to the traumatic experience may not be explicitly made. However, commonly, patients with traumatic stress problems present to GPs with general health complaints, including headaches, gastrointestinal problems, rheumatic pains, and skin disorders rather than with expressed concern about the trauma. Indeed, the traumatic event may not be mentioned at all. The distress, stigma and potential shame associated with mental health problems, or with the trauma itself (such as in cases of sexual assault), may prevent some people from mentioning the event.

As a result of such difficulties, traumatic stress conditions are often underdiagnosed in routine clinical settings.7 Thus, GPs should consider asking, particularly during their assessment of somatoform or psychosomatic presentations, whether the person has experienced a traumatic event. If post-traumatic mental health problems are suspected, a brief screening measure, such as the one provided in Box 2, should be used to screen for PTSD. Other useful screening instruments are available from the United States Department of Veterans Affairs National Center for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (http://www.ncptsd.va.gov/ncmain/assessment/ptsd_screening.jsp).

Management

The following management advice is based on a recent evidence-based review that analysed the findings of over 69 well controlled psychological and pharmacological treatment studies. This process was consistent with National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) evidence review specifications.9 The NHMRC-approved Australian guidelines for the treatment of adults with acute stress disorder and posttraumatic stress disorder5 were developed as a result of this process. The guidelines, as well as summary versions for practitioners and consumers, are available at the websites of the NHMRC (http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/publications/) and the Australian Centre for Posttraumatic Mental Health (http://www.acpmh.unimelb.edu.au).

When and why to refer

GPs can do much to assist people recovering from trauma. Reassurance and support, simple information, and advice on self-care will often be enough to facilitate a natural recovery process. However, if the person’s symptoms are severe, and associated with high levels of prolonged distress, or interfere in social and occupational functioning, referral to a mental health care provider (such as a psychiatrist or clinical psychologist) is advisable. Helping the patient to understand what to expect is an important component of referral for specialist care. Trauma-focused psychological treatment (CBT, or EMDR plus in-vivo exposure) can be expected to reduce the symptoms of PTSD, relieve anxiety and depression, and improve quality of life. These therapies can also be effective for people who have experienced prolonged or repeated traumatic events, although more time to establish a trusting therapeutic alliance, more attention to teaching emotional regulation skills, and a gradual approach to exposure therapy may be required in such cases. Interventions that focus purely on reducing symptoms (such as anxiety management), although not as effective when used on their own, are useful adjuncts to trauma-focused treatment. Non-trauma-focused interventions, such as supportive counselling, should not normally be provided to adults with PTSD. Specialist pharmacological treatment for PTSD is best managed by an appropriately experienced psychiatrist, although the continued involvement of patients’ GPs in the process is strongly recommended.

Unfortunately, research indicates that only a minority of practitioners apply evidence-based treatments for PTSD in their routine clinical care.13 Thus, when referring patients for specialist psychological or pharmacological treatment, it would be prudent to consider whether the specialist practitioner has expertise in evidence-based trauma interventions.

  • David Forbes1
  • Mark C Creamer1
  • Andrea J Phelps1
  • Anne-Laure Couineau1
  • John A Cooper1
  • Richard A Bryant2
  • Alexander C McFarlane3
  • Grant J Devilly4
  • Lynda R Matthews5
  • Beverley Raphael6

  • 1 Australian Centre for Posttraumatic Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC.
  • 2 School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW.
  • 3 Centre for Military and Veterans’ Health, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA.
  • 4 Brain Sciences Institute, Swinburne University, Melbourne, VIC.
  • 5 Behavioural and Community Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW.
  • 6 Centre for Disasters and Terrorism, University of Western Sydney, Sydney, NSW.


Correspondence: dforbes@unimelb.edu.au

Acknowledgements: 

We thank Dr Adele Weston from Health Technology Analysts for support and assistance in the guideline development project in her role as Guideline Assessment Registrar consultant. We also thank the staff of the Australian Centre for Posttraumatic Mental Health for their assistance with this project.

Competing interests:

None identified.

  • 1. Creamer M, Burgess P, McFarlane AC. Post-traumatic stress disorder: findings from the Australian National Survey of Mental Health and Well-being. Psychol Med 2001; 31: 1237-1247.
  • 2. Kessler RC, Sonnega A, Hughes M, Nelson CB. Posttraumatic stress disorder in the national comorbidity survey. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1995; 52: 1048-1060.
  • 3. American Psychiatric Association. Practice guideline for the treatment of patients with acute stress disorder and posttraumatic stress disorder. Arlington, Va: APA, 2004. http://www.psych.org/psych_pract/treatg/pg/ASD_PTSD_05-15-06.pdf (accessed Jun 2007).
  • 4. Bryant RA. Early predictors of posttraumatic stress disorder. Biol Psychiatry 2003; 53: 789-795.
  • 5. Australian Centre for Posttraumatic Mental Health. Australian guidelines for the treatment of adults with acute stress disorder and posttraumatic stress disorder. Melbourne: ACPMH, 2007. http://www.acpmh.unimelb.edu.au/Resources/guidelines/ACPMH_FullASDandPTSDGuidelines.pdf (accessed Jun 2007).
  • 6. National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health. Post-traumatic stress disorder. The management of PTSD in adults and children in primary and secondary care. National Clinical Practice Guideline No. 26. London: Gaskell and the British Psychological Society, 2005. http://www.nice.org.uk/pdf/CG026fullguideline.pdf (accessed Jun 2007).
  • 7. Zimmerman M, Mattia JI. Is posttraumatic stress disorder underdiagnosed in routine clinical settings? J Nerv Ment Dis 1999; 187: 420-428.
  • 8. Breslau N, Peterson EL, Kessler RC, Schultz LR. Short screening scale for DSM-IV posttraumatic stress disorder. Am J Psychiatry 1999; 156: 908-911.
  • 9. National Health and Medical Research Council. How to review the evidence: systematic identification and review of the scientific literature. Canberra: NHMRC, 2000. http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/publications/synopses/cp65syn.htm (accessed Jun 2007).
  • 10. Weathers FW, Litz BT, Herman DS, et al. The PTSD checklist (PCL): reliability, validity, and diagnostic utility. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies, San Antonio, Tex, October 1993. http://www.pdhealth.mil/library/downloads/PCL_sychometrics.doc (accessed Jun 2007).
  • 11. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 4th ed. Washington, DC: APA, 1994.
  • 12. Forbes D, Creamer M, Biddle D. The validity of the PTSD checklist as a measure of symptomatic change in combat-related PTSD. Behav Res Ther 2001; 39: 977-986.
  • 13. Rosen CS, Chow HC, Finney JF, et al. VA practice patterns and practice guidelines for treating posttraumatic stress disorder. J Trauma Stress 2004; 17: 213-222.

Author

remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Comment
Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.