Connect
MJA
MJA

Primary care reform using a layered approach to the Medicare Benefits Scheme: unpredictable and unmeasured

Justin J Beilby
Med J Aust 2007; 187 (2): . || doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2007.tb01141.x
Published online: 16 July 2007

The time has come to review and reflect on where these reforms are meant to be leading

There is now a plethora of new Medicare Benefits Scheme (MBS) item numbers encompassing chronic disease management, diabetes annual cycle of care, asthma cycle of care, 45-year-old health check, health assessments for older people and refugees, general practitioner mental health care, pregnancy support counselling service, and domiciliary medication management reviews. The availability of these item numbers would appear to be logical, as they are linked to important national policy initiatives such as the National Chronic Disease Strategy,1 Australian Better Health Initiative,2 and the National Mental Health Strategy.3 However, of increasing concern is that, with each budget cycle, another layer of new MBS item numbers is added. There is little clarification of what the final end point of these reforms will be. If the goal is a strong, robust and integrated primary care system4 that will deliver improved outcomes for these patient groups, then using the rather crude tool of successive new MBS item numbers alone is unpredictable5 and is likely to provide only part of the solution.


  • Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA.



  • 1. National Health Priority Action Council. National chronic disease strategy. Canberra: Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing, 2006. http://www.health.gov.au/internet/wcms/publishing.nsf/Content/pq-ncds-strat (accessed May 2007).
  • 2. Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing. Australian Better Health Initiative: promoting good health, prevention and early intervention. Canberra: DoHA, 2006. http://www.health.gov.au/internet/wcms/publishing.nsf/Content/feb2006coag03.htm (accessed May 2007).
  • 3. Council of Australian Governments. National action plan on mental health 2006–2011. Canberra: COAG, 2006. http://www.coag.gov.au/meetings/140706/docs/nap_mental_health.pdf (accessed May 2007).
  • 4. Starfield B, Shi L. Policy relevant determinants of health: an international perspective. Health Policy 2002; 60: 201-281.
  • 5. Gauld R, Mays N. Are New Zealand’s new primary health organisations fit for purpose? BMJ 2006; 333: 1216-1218.
  • 6. Georgiou A, Burns J, McKenzie S, et al. Monitoring change in diabetes care using diabetes registers: experience from Divisions of General Practice. Aust Fam Physician 2006, 35: 77-80.
  • 7. Zwar NA, Hermiz O, Comino EJ, et al. Do multidisciplinary care plans result in better care for type 2 diabetes? Aust Fam Physician 2007; 36: 85-89.
  • 8. O’Halloran J, Ng A, Britt H, Charles J. EPC encounters in Australian general practice. Aust Fam Physician 2006; 35: 8-10.
  • 9. Georgeff M. E-health and the transformation of health care. Melbourne: Australian Centre for Health Research, 2007. http://www.achr.com.au/pdfs/ehealth%20and%20the%20transofrmation%20of%20healthcare.pdf (accessed May 2007).
  • 10. Hickie IB, McGorry PD. Increased access to evidence-based primary mental health care: will the implementation match the rhetoric? Med J Aust 2007; 187: 100-103.
  • 11. Byles J, Young A, Wheway V. Annual health assessments for older Australia women: uptake and equity. Aust N Z J Public Health 2007; 31: 170-173.
  • 12. Wilkinson D, McElroy H, Beilby J, et al. Characteristics of general practitioners that provided health assessments, care plans or case conferences, as part of the Enhanced Primary Care program. Aust Health Rev 2002; 25 (6): 137-144.
  • 13. Beilby J, Holton C. Chronic disease management in Australia: evidence and policy mismatch, with asthma as an example. Chronic Illn 2005; 1: 73-80.
  • 14. Medicare Australia. Statistics. http://www.medicareaustralia.gov.au/providers/health_statistics/statistical_reporting/medicare.shtml (accessed May 2007).
  • 15. Burgess T, Beilby J, Zwar N, et al. Evaluation of the Asthma 3+ Visit Plan. Final report. Canberra: Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing, 2004.
  • 16. Harris MF, Zwar NA. Care of patients with chronic disease: the challenge for general practice. Med J Aust 2007; 187: 104-107. <MJA full text>
  • 17. Bodenheimer T, Wagner EH, Grumbach K. Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness. JAMA 2002; 288: 1775-1779.
  • 18. United Kingdom Department of Health. Investing in general practice. The new medical services contract. London: DH, 2003. http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH_4071966 (accessed Jun 2007).
  • 19. Freeman GK, Horder JP, Howie JGR, et al Evolving general practice consultation in Britain: issues of length and context. BMJ 2002; 324: 880-882.
  • 20. Ofman J, Badamgarav E, Henning J, et al. Does disease management improve clinical and economic outcomes in patients with chronic disease? A systematic review. Am J Med 2004; 117: 182-192.

Author

remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Comment
Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.