Connect
MJA
MJA

New ideas about medical professionalism

Donald H Irvine
Med J Aust 2006; 184 (5): . || doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2006.tb00201.x
Published online: 6 March 2006

Public trust depends on promoting good practice and protecting the public from poor practice

Traditional medical professionalism derives from medical practice in the late 18th and early 19th centuries. In the past 10 years, the search has been on in the United Kingdom — and in other countries — for a “new professionalism” more in harmony with patients’ expectations and the nature of medical practice today.1-5 Last month, the Royal College of Physicians of London affirmed its commitment to professionalism as the foundation of good quality medical practice through a Working Party report titled “Doctors in society: medical professionalism in a changing world”.6 That commitment is important, and has relevance beyond the UK. It comes at a time when some consider the very notion of “profession” and “professionalism” to be outmoded. The report and a supplement of excellent evidence7 (underpinning the report) is seen as the starting point for further development.


  • Picker Institute Europe, Oxford, United Kingdom.


Correspondence: 

  • 1. Stacey M. Regulating British medicine: the General Medical Council. Chichester: Wiley, 1992.
  • 2. Calman C. The profession of medicine. BMJ 1994; 309: 1140-1143.
  • 3. Irvine DH. The performance of doctors. I: Professionalism and regulation in a changing world. BMJ 1997; 314: 1540-1542.
  • 4. Cruess RL, Cruess SR, Johnston SE. Professionalism: an ideal to be sustained. Lancet 2000; 356: 156-159.
  • 5. Medical Professionalism Project. Medical professionalism in the new millennium: a physicians’ charter. Med J Aust 2002; 177: 263-265. <MJA full text>
  • 6. Royal College of Physicians. Doctors in society: medical professionalism in a changing world. London: RCP, 2005: xi, 14, 10. Available at: http://www.rcplondon.ac.uk/pubs/books/docinsoc/ (accessed Jan 2006).
  • 7. Royal College of Physicians. Doctors in society; medical professionalism in a changing world. Technical supplement to a report of a working party of the Royal College of Physicians of London. London: RCP, 2005. Available at: http://www.rcplondon.ac.uk/pubs/books/docinsoc/ (accessed Jan 2006).
  • 8. Irvine DH. Time for hard decisions on patient-centred professionalism. Med J Aust 2004; 181: 271-274. <MJA full text>
  • 9. Hafferty F. Measuring professionalism: a commentary. In: Stern DT, editor. Measuring medical professionalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.
  • 10. Shipman Inquiry (Dame Janet Smith, Chairman). Fifth report. Safeguarding patients: lessons from the past — proposals for the future. Cm 6394. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, 2004. Available at: http://www.the-shipman-inquiry.org.uk/fifthreport.asp (accessed Jan 2006).

Author

remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Comment
Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.