Teaching on the run

Volume 182 - Issue 3

Teaching on the run tips 7: effective use of questions

Authors:  Fiona R Lake, Alistair W Vickery and Gerard Ryan

Med J Aust 2005; 182 (3): 126-127. || doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2005.tb06615.x
Published online: 7 February 2005

Your students and trainees learn better when they are involved in the teaching episode,1-3 and an effective way to involve them is to ask questions. By using questions you are able to:

  • stimulate and engage learners;

  • find out their learning needs and knowledge level, so that what you teach them is relevant and pitched at an appropriate level;

  • promote higher-order thinking (ie, clinical reasoning);

  • monitor how learners are progressing; and

  • encourage reflection.

Types of questions

When using questions to test knowledge, we should recognise the concept of a hierarchy of knowledge,4 from low level (facts) to high level (synthesis and analysis) (Box).4,5 The kind of questions used — whether “closed” (ie, requiring a single correct answer) or “open” (requiring the learner to combine pieces of information and formulate an answer) — pitches the discussion at different levels.6 Questions used should be appropriate to the learner’s level of knowledge. However, we should be attempting to promote thinking in all, from the medical student to the registrar.

Promoting higher-order thinking and reasoning

When teaching, clinicians often ask questions aimed at elucidating low level knowledge. In 1933, John Dewey, one of the most influential thinkers on education in the 20th century, proposed that thinking and problem-solving occurred not when answering a question posed by a teacher, but when attempting to solve a problem important to the learner.7 We learn more from what we “don’t know” than what we “do know”. So shifting from asking “What is the cause of . . .?” to “What are you uncertain about?” moves away from simple factual recall and promotes thinking. A strategy to introduce this approach is SNAPPS, as described in “Tips 4”,8 in which the learner probes the teacher about the learner’s areas of uncertainty.


Authors


Competing interests


Acknowledgements


References