Managing allegations of scientific misconduct and fraud: lessons from the “Hall affair”

• The Medical Journal of Australia, Sydney, NSW.

---

• 1. Sigma Xi. The Scientific Research Society. Honor in science. Available at: www.sigmaxi.org/programs/ethics/publications.shtml (accessed Jan 2004).
• 2. US Congress. Fraud in Biomedical Research, 1981: Hearings before the Committee on Science and Technology, Subcommittee on Investigations and Oversight, 97th Congress, 1st session. Washington DC: US Government Printing Office, 1981.
• 3. University of New South Wales Reports. Response by the Vice-Chancellor to the report on disclosures involving Professor Bruce Hall. 17 April 2003. Available at: www.vc.unsw.edu.au/Reports/V-C%27sResponsetoBruceHall.shtml (accessed Jan 2004).
• 4. Scientific and financial misconduct [radio program]. The Science Show, presented by Norman Swan. ABC Radio National; April 13 2002. Transcript available at www.abc.net.au/rn/science/ss/stories/s531406.htm (accessed Jan 2004).
• 5. National Health and Medical Research Council. Joint NHMRC/AVCC statement on research practice. Available at: www.health.gov.au/nhmrc/research/general/nhmrcavc.htm (accessed Jan 2004).
• 6. University of New South Wales Report. External independent inquiry: Terms of reference. Allegations against a UNSW scientist. 11 June, 2002. Available at: www.vc.unsw.edu.au/Reports/TermsofReference.shtml (accessed Jan 2004).
• 7. Hall vs The University of New South Wales [2003] NSWSC 669. August 15 2003. Available at: http://caselaw.lawlink.nsw.gov.au/isysquery/irlb006/2/doc (accessed Jan 2004).
• 8. University of New South Wales. Report by the Vice-Chancellor on findings relative to allegations of misconduct against Professor Bruce Hall. 23 December 2003. Available at: www.vc.unsw.edu.au/Reports/External.shtml (accessed Jan 2004).
• 9. Four Corners. The trials of Professor Hall [television program]. ABC Television, October 6, 2003. Transcript available at: www.abc.net.au/4corners/content/2003/transcripts/s960912.htm (accessed Jan 2004).
• 10. Gerard I. Experts back up scientist’s defence. The Australian 2004; January 7: 3. Available at: www.theaustralian.news.com.au/printpage/0,5942,8338178,00.html (accessed Jan 2004).
• 11. Rennie D. An American perspective on research integrity. BMJ 1998; 316: 1726-1733.
• 12. Dayton L. Playing for selfish stakes bad science. The Australian 2003; December 24: 3. Available at: www.theaustralian.news.com.au/printpage/0,5942,8248423,00.html (accessed Jan 2004).
• 13. Hall B. Let experts judge their peers. The Australian 2004; January 7: 27. Available at: www.theaustralian.news.com.au/printpage/0,5942,8335917,00.html (accessed Jan 2004).
• 14. O’Neill O. A question of trust. 2002 BBC Reith lectures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
• 15. Korenman SG, Beck R, Wengner NS, Lew V. Evaluation of research norms of scientists and administrators responsible for academic research integrity. JAMA 1998; 279: 213-217.
• 16. Institute of Medicine and National Research Council. Integrity in scientific research. Creating an environment that promotes responsible conduct. Washington DC: The National Academic Press, 2002.
• 17. Majerus PW. Fraud in medicine. Presidential address delivered before the 74th meeting of the American Society for Clinical Investigation. Washington DC, 8 May 1982. J Clin Invest 1982; 70: 213-217.