To the Editor: The Health Practitioner Regulation National Law Act 2009 (Part 8, Sections 140 and 141) enshrines mandatory notification in the new national registration framework. As registered health practitioners, clinician-researchers are bound by the notification requirements. This raises the question of whether mandatory notification has implications for observational research in health services that is conducted by clinician-researchers. In particular, how likely is it that these requirements will lead to reclassification of one’s observations from “research data” to “notification evidence”?
The full article is accessible to AMA
members and paid subscribers.
Login to MJA or subscribe now.
- 1 Centre for Health Communication, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW.
- 2 School of Law, University of New England, Armidale, NSW.
Correspondence: r.iedema@uts.edu.au
- 1. Health Care Complaints Commission, New South Wales Government. Mandatory reporting — what practitioners need to know. Sydney: HCCC, 2010. http://www.hccc.nsw.gov.au/Information/Information-For-Health-Providers/Mandatory-reporting---What-Practitioners-need-to-know-/default.aspx (accessed Apr 2011).
- 2. Iedema R, Merrick ET, Rajbhandari D, et al. Viewing the taken-for-granted from under a different aspect: a video-based method in pursuit of patient safety. Int J Mult Res Approaches 2009; 3: 290-301.
- 3. Iedema R. Creating safety by strengthening clinicians’ capacity for reflexivity. BMJ Qual Saf 2011; 20 Suppl 1: i83-i86.
Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.