Incorrect formula and number of trial subjects in Box: In “It’s time to depolarise the unhelpful PSA-testing debate and put into practice lessons from the two major international screening trials” in the 5 April 2010 issue of the Journal (Med J Aust 2010; 192: 393-396), in the Box, there was an error in the total number of prostate cancers detected in the screening arm of the ERSPC trial and in the formula used to calculate differences between the two arms. The Box, with corrected figures in the last two columns and a replacement formula in a footnote, is reproduced here.
The full article is accessible to AMA
members and paid subscribers.
Login to MJA or subscribe now.
Correspondence:
Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.

