In reply: Flynn points to some minor technical differences in my historical recount of the handling, by the Medical Practitioners Board of Victoria, of the complaint against the medical specialists involved in a late-term abortion.1 None requires a reply, save for Flynn’s assertion that “the Board does not currently have the power to conciliate disputes or conduct mediations”.
The full article is accessible to AMA
members and paid subscribers.
Login to MJA or subscribe now.
- Melbourne, VIC.
Correspondence: p.gerber@bigpond.net.au
- 1. Gerber P. Late-term abortion: what can be learned from Royal Women's Hospital v Medical Practitioners Board of Victoria? Med J Aust 2007; 186: 359-362. <MJA full text>
Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.