Connect
MJA
MJA

Clinical paradigms revisited

Andrew P Wright
Med J Aust 2007; 186 (7) || doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2007.tb00949.x
Published online: 2 April 2007

To the Editor: I was surprised by Wong’s letter on the role of history-taking and examination in the diagnostic process.1 I would suggest that Wong, as a surgical registrar, receives the majority of his abdominal pain referrals from the medical staff of the emergency department. Although he advocates the liberal use of abdominal computed tomography (CT) scanning, I believe he ignores the fact that another medical practitioner has already taken a history and performed an examination that has suggested a surgical cause of pain for which a surgical opinion is then requested. Wong would thus remain unaware of other cases in which patients present with abdominal pain but the case is ruled non-surgical on the basis of history, examination and limited investigation not involving abdominal CT scanning.

The full article is accessible to AMA
members and paid subscribers.
Login to MJA or subscribe now.


  • Department of Anaesthesia, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Sydney, NSW.


Correspondence: wrightan@tpg.com.au

  • 1. Wong K. Clinical paradigms revisited [letter]. Med J Aust 2006; 185: 671-672. <MJA full text>
  • 2. Schattner A. Clinical paradigms revisited [letter]. Med J Aust 2006; 185: 672. <MJA full text>

Author

remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Comment
Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.