Connect
MJA
MJA

Evidence-based healthcare 10 years on: is the National Institute of Clinical Studies the answer?

Louise V Hall
Med J Aust 2002; 176 (2) || doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2002.tb04301.x
Published online: 21 January 2002

To the Editor: The recent creation of the National Institute for Clinical Studies (NICS) is an exciting new opportunity for bridging the gap between evidence and practice.1

The full article is accessible to AMA
members and paid subscribers.
Login to MJA or subscribe now.

  • 1. Silagy C. Evidence-based healthcare 10 years on: is the National Institute of Clinical Studies the answer? [editorial] Med J Aust 2001; 175: 124-125. <eMJA full text>
  • 2. Donabedian A. The quality of care: how can it be assessed? JAMA 1988; 260: 1743-1748.
  • 3. Leeder S, Rychetnik L. Ethics and evidence-based medicine. Med J Aust 2001; 175: 161-164.
  • 4. Headrick L, Neuhauser D. Quality health care. JAMA 1995; 273: 1718-1720.

Author

remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Comment
Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.