Connect
MJA
MJA

Health Impairment Notifications About Doctors to the Australian Medical Regulator, 2012–2022: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Marie M. Bismark, Dilanka Hettiarachchi, Martin Fletcher, Owen Bradfield, Anu Tayal, Yamna Taouk
Correspondence: mbismark@unimelb.edu.au
Med J Aust 2026; 224 (1) || doi: 10.5694/mja2.70131

Abstract

Objectives

To assess the prevalence, characteristics and outcomes of health impairment notifications to the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency (Ahpra) and to assess the influence of doctor age, sex, specialty, practice location and country of training on the incidence of health impairment notifications.

Study Design

Retrospective cohort study; analysis of linked de-identified Ahpra medical register and health impairment notifications data.

Setting, Participants

All doctors registered to practise in Australia (except New South Wales) for whom notifications of concerns about physical or mental illness, cognitive decline, substance use disorder or other impairment to safely practising medicine were received by Ahpra during 1 July 2012–30 June 2022.

Main Outcome Measures

Health impairment notifications, overall and by notification type and specialty; influence of doctors' characteristics on the incidence of notifications.

Results

During 2012–2022, 112,677 doctors were registered to practise in Australia (other than New South Wales). A total of 1732 health impairment notifications were recorded, including at least one notification for 1258 doctors (1.1%). In multivariable analyses, the incidence of health impairment notifications was higher for male than female doctors (adjusted incidence rate ratio [aIRR], 1.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.26–1.67), for doctors aged 70 years or older than for those aged 30–39 years (aIRR, 2.92; 95% CI, 2.30–3.70) and for doctors in regional (aIRR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.12–1.58), rural (aIRR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.03–1.57) and remote areas (aIRR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.03–2.33) than in metropolitan areas. Among doctors with specialist qualifications, the incidence of notifications was higher for psychiatrists than internal medicine physicians (aIRR, 2.28; 95% CI, 1.62–3.21) and the incidence of substance use notifications was highest for anaesthetists (vs. internal medicine physicians: aIRR, 2.83; 95% CI, 1.66–4.83). Compared with doctors who trained in Australia, doctors who trained in non-comparable jurisdictions were less likely to be subjects of health impairment notifications (aIRR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.43–0.64). Of 1708 notifications with final Ahpra determinations, 367 (21.5%) resulted in practice restrictions or removal from practice.

Conclusions

Health impairment notifications are infrequent but can have serious consequences for doctors. The incidence of health impairment notifications is influenced by doctor age, sex, specialty and location. Specific measures that take these factors into account could support workplace health and safety for doctors and protect patients from harm.

  • Marie M. Bismark, Dilanka Hettiarachchi, Martin Fletcher, Owen Bradfield, Anu Tayal, Yamna Taouk



Correspondence: mbismark@unimelb.edu.au

Author

remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Comment
Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.