Connect
MJA
MJA

Specialty College Selection: Why Change is Critical to Support a Future Rural Workforce

Matthew R. McGrail, Jenny May AM, Katherine Logan
Correspondence: m.mcgrail@uq.edu.au
Med J Aust 2026; 224 (1) || doi: 10.5694/mja2.70121
Published online: 18 December 2025

Abstract

There is consistent evidence of who is more likely to practise in a rural location; however, current selection criteria used by most specialty colleges do not reflect this. In fact, our evidence-based perspective article shows how specialty selection is likely driving many rural interested graduates away from rural pathways, perhaps never to return post-fellowship. The Australian Government has strongly invested in rural training, with greatly increased opportunities for end-to-end pathways and raised awareness of social accountability of training programs. However, specialty training pathways have been slow to change the selection criteria, which should align with supporting workforce diversity and distribution into rural areas. We highlight potentially untapped opportunities to directly address workforce distribution that require negligible financial costs to change criteria and processes.

  • Matthew R. McGrail, Jenny May AM, Katherine Logan



Correspondence: m.mcgrail@uq.edu.au

Author

remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Comment
Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.