Volume 215 - Issue 11

Screening and brief interventions for harmful alcohol use: where to now?

Author:  Chris B Holmwood

Med J Aust 2021; 215 (11): 526-526. || doi: 10.5694/mja2.51342
Published online: 13 December 2021
In reply

In reply: Malinovská and Brož’s1 description of the situation in the Czech Republic demonstrates just how difficult it can be to implement alcohol screening, brief intervention and referral for treatment (SBIRT), even with legislation compelling health professionals to provide the intervention. Lack of knowledge by clinicians is one barrier, along with hesitancy to raise the issue, for a range of different reasons. Education can assist with these two factors. Other barriers include time pressure and competing clinical priorities.2,3

Good quality evidence on the delivery of services in Australian primary care, including dealing with alcohol‐related presentations and SBIRT, has not been available since the cessation of the Bettering the Evaluation and Care of Health (BEACH)4 surveys in 2016; therefore, comparative data are not available in Australia.

Essentially, if SBIRT is contemplated on a systemic basis, additional resources must be allocated in addition to education. However, from the Scottish experience, even additional resources do not guarantee that there will be any effect on drinking on a population basis.5 There should be evidence‐based public health measures, mostly aimed at supply reduction, to bring about a significant reduction in drinking.

A recent review6 describes how measures such as taxation, limiting outlets and reducing advertising have resulted in impressive reductions in alcohol intake in those former Soviet Union countries where they have been implemented.



Author


Competing interests


References