Is the UCAT appropriate for selecting undergraduate medical students?

David A Powis, Don Munro and Miles R Bore
Med J Aust 2021; 214 (2): . || doi: 10.5694/mja2.50906
Published online: 1 February 2021

Non‐academic personal qualities are also desirable in doctors: higher mental abilities, empathy, ethics, creativity

Medicine is an enduringly popular career choice for several reasons, including the desire to heal the sick and to improve people’s health, but for many, no doubt, also the prospect of guaranteed employment with a satisfactory income and the elevated social status enjoyed by doctors. The net result is that for most medical schools there have been, and still are, far more applicants than places available.1,2,3 This poses an annual selection dilemma.

  • University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW

Competing interests:

We developed the Personal Qualities Assessment ( and receive royalties from institutions that use it in student selection procedures.

  • 1. Powis D, Hamilton J, McManus IC. Widening access by changing the criteria for selecting medical students. Teach Teach Educ 2007; 23: 1235–1245.
  • 2. Powis D. Selecting medical students: an unresolved challenge. Med Teach 2015; 37: 252–260.
  • 3. Powis D, Munro D, Bore M, et al. Why is it so hard to consider personal qualities when selecting medical students? Med Teach 2019; 42: 366–371.
  • 4. McManus IC, Woolf K, Dacre J, et al. The Academic Backbone: longitudinal continuation in educational achievement from secondary school and medical school to MRCP(UK) and the specialist register in UK medical students and doctors. BMC Med Educ 2013; 11: 242.
  • 5. Ferguson E, James D, Madeley L. Factors associated with success at medical school: a systematic review of the literature. BMJ 2002; 324: 952–957.
  • 6. Powis D, James D, Ferguson E. Demographic and socio‐economic associations with academic attainment (UCAS tariff scores) in applicants to medical school. Med Educ 2007; 41: 242–249.
  • 7. Vinson T, Cooney G, Turnbull J. Admission to medical school: the Newcastle experiment. Programmed Learning and Education Technology 1979; 16: 70–87.
  • 8. Australian Council for Education Research. Undergraduate Medicine and Health Sciences Admissions Test. May 2013. Archived: (viewed Nov 2020).
  • 9. Powis D, Munro D, Bore M, et al. In‐course and career outcomes predicted by medical school selection procedures based on personal qualities. Med Teach 2020; 42: 944–946.
  • 10. University Clinical Aptitude Test ANZ Consortium. Preparation advice and practice tests. 2020. (viewed Nov 2020).
  • 11. Patterson F, Zibarras L, Ashworth V. Situational judgement tests in medical education and training: research, theory and practice: AMEE Guide No. 100. Med Teach 2016; 38: 3–17.
  • 12. Griffin B, Horton GL, Lampe L, et al. The change from UMAT to UCAT for undergraduate medical school applicants: impact on selection outcomes. Med J Aust 2021; 214: 85–90.
  • 13. Griffin B, Bayl‐Smith P, Hu W. Predicting patterns of change and stability in student performance across a medical degree. J Med Educ 2018; 52: 438–446.


remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.