Connect
MJA
MJA

Emergency department presentations by residents of Sydney quarantine hotels during the COVID‐19 outbreak

Michael Dinh, Owen Hutchings, Kendall Bein, James Shaw, Aditi Raut, Saartje Berendsen Russell, Dianna Jagers, Rajip Thapa, Gregory Fox, James Edwards, Timothy Wand and Warwick Britton
Med J Aust 2021; 214 (10): 473-474. || doi: 10.5694/mja2.51046
Published online: 7 June 2021

In response to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) outbreak in early 2020, a public health order was enacted in March 2020 that required all people arriving in New South Wales from overseas to quarantine for fourteen days.1 To manage the process and minimise the risk of community transmission, all people who arrived from 16 March 2020 were accommodated in 30 temporarily re‐purposed hotels in inner Sydney and the central business district. People with identified acute or ongoing health care needs were referred to the Royal Prince Alfred (RPA) Virtual Hospital, including those who tested positive for the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS CoV‐2), and were housed in three Special Health Accommodation hotels to facilitate remote monitoring of their symptoms and signs according to the RPA Virtual Hospital model of care.2 Analysis of the characteristics of these patients will inform the public health and hospital response to COVID‐19 and ensure a patient‐centred approach to health services for quarantined people.

We undertook a retrospective study of emergency department (ED) presentations by patients referred from Special Health Accommodation hotels in Sydney during 1 June – 30 September 2020. We analysed clinical characteristics and outcomes recorded in electronic medical records, including diagnosis categories, comorbid conditions, and ED length of stay. Our study was approved by the Sydney Local Health District Research Ethics Committee (references, X20‐0365; 2020/ETH02007).

During June – September 2020, 2774 people were registered for accommodation in Special Health Accommodation hotels, of whom 461 (16.6%) presented at least once to the RPA ED (542 ED presentations in total). Thirteen patients (2.8%) were diagnosed with COVID‐19, none of whom required intensive care. The most frequent ED diagnosis categories were mental health (102 presentations, 19%) and cardiovascular conditions (84, 15%) (Box 1). The most frequent reasons for mental health presentations were anxiety (43 presentations), suicidal ideation (24), and acute psychosis (11) (Box 2). The median length of stay for presentations with mental health conditions (543 min; interquartile range [IQR], 372–788 min) was longer than for non‐mental health presentations (433 min; IQR, 302–598 min). Mental health‐related presentations were also associated with higher triage acuity: 86 presentations (84%) were deemed urgent or potentially life‐threatening, compared with 316 of the 440 ED presentations not related to mental health (72%). A larger proportion of mental health presentations were by patients with pre‐existing mental health conditions (65, 64% v 49 non‐mental health presentations, 11%).

The COVID‐19 pandemic continues to have significant direct and indirect health care consequences, including effects on mental health.3 Mental health presentations to the RPA ED comprised 19% of presentations by people from Special Health Accommodation hotels, five times the proportion for all ED presentations in Australia (3.6%).4,5 Further, lengthy ED stays (the median stay was longer than nine hours) probably compounded psychological stress in patients who presented with mental health problems; only 16% of patients were admitted or discharged within the recommended four hours (Box 1).

Our study, the first to assess the impact of mental health during hotel quarantine in Australia, highlights the need for increased psychological support and other services for people in quarantine.6 While quarantine was a vital public health measure for curbing the spread of SARS‐CoV‐2, isolation can cause direct and indirect physical and psychological harm.7 All patients who presented to the RPA ED with mental health problems were routinely followed up by RPA Virtual Hospital psychologists. A prospective study is currently underway to better understand the psychological impact of hotel quarantine as the COVID‐19 pandemic response evolves in 2021.

 

Box 1 – Characteristics of 542 presentations by people from Special Health Accommodation hotels to the Royal Prince Alfred emergency department, June–September 2020

Characteristic

Number


Age (years), mean (SD)

43.5 (22.0)

Sex (men)

284 (52.4%)

Triage category

 

 1 (life threatening)

0

 2 (potentially life threatening)

87 (16%)

 3 (urgent)

315 (58%)

 4 (semi‐urgent)

121 (22%)

 5 (non‐urgent)

19 (4%)

Diagnosis category

 

 Mental health

102 (19%)

 Cardiovascular

84 (15%)

 Abdominal/gastrointestinal

68 (13%)

 Musculoskeletal

35 (6%)

 Injury

32 (6%)

 Neurological

28 (5%)

 Urological

27 (5%)

 Fever/infection

26 (5%)

 Social

23 (4%)

 Obstetrics/gynaecology

23 (4%)

 Allergy/skin rash

19 (4%)

 Respiratory

12 (2%)

 Ear, nose, throat, and eye

12 (2%)

 Administrative/pathology tests/prescriptions

11 (2%)

 General complaints

10 (2%)

 Drug health/toxicology

10 (2%)

 Haematology/oncology

7 (1%)

 Other

13 (2%)

Length of stay: less than 4 hours, by disposition

 

 All presentations

86/542 (16%)

 Discharged from emergency department

58/416 (14%)

 Admitted to inpatient ward

28/126 (22%)

Pre‐existing conditions (461 patients)

 

 None

154 (33%)

 Mental health

89 (19%)

 Hypertension

83 (18%)

 Ischaemic heart disease

25 (5%)

 Diabetes mellitus

34 (7%)

 Respiratory disorder

28 (6%)

 Renal disorder

5 (1%)

 Cancer

15 (4%)

 Neurological disorder

13 (3%)

 Pregnancy

24/220 (11%)

Disposition at discharge

 

 Treatment complete

409 (75%)

 Admitted to critical care ward

14 (3%)

 Admitted to ward

112 (21%)

 Discharged

7 (1%)


SD = standard deviation.

 

Box 2 – Mental health presentations by people from Special Health Accommodation hotels to the Royal Prince Alfred emergency department, June–September 2020


 

Received 23 October 2020, accepted 16 March 2021

  • Michael Dinh1,2
  • Owen Hutchings3
  • Kendall Bein1,2
  • James Shaw2
  • Aditi Raut2
  • Saartje Berendsen Russell1,2
  • Dianna Jagers3
  • Rajip Thapa3
  • Gregory Fox2,4
  • James Edwards2
  • Timothy Wand2,4
  • Warwick Britton3,5

  • 1 Green Light Institute for Emergency Care, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW
  • 2 Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW
  • 3 RPA Virtual Hospital, Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, NSW
  • 4 The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW
  • 5 The Centenary Institute, Sydney, NSW


Acknowledgements: 

We thank all the staff who provided care for patients in the Special Health Accommodation hotels and COVID‐19 hot zones in the Royal Prince Alfred emergency department.

Competing interests:

No relevant disclosures.

Author

remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Comment
Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.