Optimising the implementation of guidelines for the post partum testing and management of gestational diabetes in South Asian women in Australia
Authors: Asvini K Subasinghe, Alison J Nankervis, Jacqueline A Boyle and Danielle Mazza
Published online: 13 July 2020
To the Editor: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is being diagnosed with increasing frequency in Australia, with the greatest prevalence reported in South Asian women.1,2 South Asian women, comprising Indians, Sri Lankans, Bangladeshis, Afghanis and Pakistanis, are more likely to have GDM and develop type 2 diabetes than Caucasian women.1,2 Data from the landmark Mothers after Gestational Diabetes in Australia trial show that about 40% of the 573 women recruited into the trial were from an Asian background.2 Retention rates for the intervention and usual care groups were 73% and 79%, respectively.2
The Royal Australian College of General Practitioners3 and the Australasian Diabetes in Pregnancy Society4 recommend oral glucose tolerance testing 6–12 weeks post partum for women who experienced a GDM‐complicated pregnancy. Repeat testing should be performed every 1–2 years among women with normal glucose tolerance and the potential for further pregnancies.
If further pregnancy is not possible, follow‐up testing should be performed every 3 years, with more frequent retesting depending on clinical circumstances.5
Although studies have been conducted to evaluate the implementation of post partum guidelines generally in women with a history of GDM,6 there is no information about the implementation and uptake of guidelines in high risk ethnic populations. Additionally, there is evidence to suggest that culturally specific GDM follow‐up care would increase adherence to diet and lifestyle modifications during the interconception period in high risk ethnic women.7 Therefore, as a high risk group for progression to type 2 diabetes following GDM, South Asian women in Australia should be targeted for testing, and culturally appropriate lifestyle interventions, before conception.
General practitioners have a critical role in the post partum, interconception and pre‐pregnancy care of women with previous GDM. This is even more pronounced in high risk populations such as South Asians. More culturally appropriate resources are therefore required to assist with recommended lifestyle modifications to reduce risks for future development of GDM or type 2 diabetes.
There is an urgent need for qualitative research to focus on identifying the barriers and enablers to the implementation of the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners guidelines for the management of GDM, with a particular focus on GDM interconception care for South Asian women. Findings may be used to inform the development phase of an intervention aimed at improving the implementation and uptake of GDM guidelines among high risk populations in Australian general practice.
Competing interests
No relevant disclosures.
References
- Bellamy L, Casas J‐P, Hingorani AD, Williams D. Type 2 diabetes mellitus after gestational diabetes: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Lancet 2019; 373: 1773–1779.
- O'Reilly SL, Dunbar JA, Versace V, et al. Mothers after Gestational Diabetes in Australia (MAGDA): a randomised controlled trial of a postnatal diabetes prevention program. PLoS Med 2016; 13: e1002092.
- Royal Australian College of General Practitioners. General practice management of type 2 diabetes 2016–18. Melbourne: RACGP, 2016. https://www.racgp.org.au/FSDEDEV/media/documents/Clinical%20Resources/Guidelines/Diabetes/General-practice-management-of-type-2-diabetes_1.pdf (viewed Dec 2019).
- Nankervis A, McIntyre HD, Moses R, et al. ADIPS consensus guidelines for the testing and diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus in Australia. Sydney: ADIPS, 2013. http://www.adips.org/downloads/adipsconsensusguidelinesgdm-03.05.13versionacceptedfinal.pdf (viewed May 2020).
- Simmons DS, Walters BNJ, Wein P, Cheung NW. Guidelines for the management of gestational diabetes mellitus revisited. Med J Aust 2002; 176: 352. https://www.mja.com.au/journal/2002/176/7/guidelines-management-gestational-diabetes-mellitus-revisited.
- Wilkinson SA, Brodribb WE, Upham S, et al. Primary care of women after gestational diabetes mellitus: mapping the evidence‐practice gap. Med J Aust 2014; 201: S74–S77. https://www.mja.com.au/journal/2014/201/3/primary-care-women-after-gestational-diabetes-mellitus-mapping-evidence-practice.
- Bandyopadhyay M, Small R, Davey MA, et al. Lived experience of gestational diabetes mellitus among immigrant South Asian women in Australia. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2011; 51: 360–364.
Forty Years in the Making: Reporting on the Co-Creation of a National Roadmap for Birthing on Country Services for the Best Start to Life
Res McCalman, Anneka J. Bowman, Roianne West, Kristie Watego, Jyai Allen, Claire Clack, Sue Kildea, Sue Kruske, Melanie Briggs, Cleone Wellington, Rebecca Coddington, Yu Gao, Isabella Garti, Sascha Kowalenko, Sarah Ireland, Catherine Austin, John D. Boffa, Marah Prior, Kelsie Kahl, Bettina Chaseling, Sarah Khaw, Emily Armstrong, Donna Hartz, Yvette Roe
Temporal Trends in Preterm Birth Associated With Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy in Victoria, Australia: A Population-Based Interrupted Time-Series Study
Melvin Marzan, Heng Jiang, Daniel Lorber Rolnik, Joanne M. Said, Lisa Hui
Linguistic Manoeuvres: Obstetric Violence Camouflages Harm and Loss of Consent From Birth
Liz Sutton, Harsha Ananthram, Rebecca Matthews
Linguistic Manoeuvres: Obstetric Violence Camouflages Harm and Loss of Consent From Birth
Bashi Kumar-Hazard, Andrew M. Bisits, Sharon L. Settecasse, Jenny Gamble, Hazel Keedle, Hannah G. Dahlen
Linguistic Manoeuvres: Obstetric Violence Camouflages Harm and Loss of Consent From Birth
Wendy Pollock, Alissa Fleming, Ensieh Fooladi, Joy Kloester, Anne Tremayne, Yasmin Zisin, Bethany Carr, Kym Davey, Suzanne Willey, Jenny Gamble
Getting on the Same Page: Why Australia Needs a National Maternity Early Warning System (MEWS) Chart
Briony A. Cutts, Lucy Bowyer, Nisha Khot, Sandra Lowe, Stefan C. Kane