Towards gender balance in the Australian intensive care medicine workforce

Lucy J Modra and Sarah A Yong
Med J Aust 2019; 211 (7): . || doi: 10.5694/mja2.50330
Published online: 7 October 2019

Achieving gender equity in intensive care medicine requires specific interventions to attract and retain female trainees and support their progress to leadership roles

For several decades, women have comprised about half of medical graduates in Australia.1 This is yet to translate into a gender‐balanced specialty workforce. In 2016, fewer than one in five practising surgeons, cardiologists and intensivists were women.2 In recognition of this, several Colleges have developed plans to improve gender balance within their specialty.

  • 1 Austin Health, Melbourne, VIC
  • 2 Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC
  • 3 Monash University, Melbourne, VIC


Competing interests:

Lucy Modra and Sarah Yong are founding convenors of the WIN‐ANZICS Committee.

  • 1. Australian Government Department of Health. Medical Training Review Panel: nineteenth report. May 2016. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia, 2016. (viewed June 2019).
  • 2. Australian Government Department of Health. National Health Workforce Dataset. Medical fact sheets 2016 (viewed June 2019).
  • 3. Modra LJ, Yong SA, Austin DE. Women in leadership in intensive care medicine. ICU Manage Pract 2016; 16: 174–176.
  • 4. Venkatesh B, Mehta S, Angus DC, et al. Women in Intensive Care study: a preliminary assessment of international data on female representation in the ICU physician workforce, leadership and academic positions. Crit Care 2018; 22: 211.
  • 5. Mehta S, Burns KEA, Machado FR, et al. Gender parity in critical care medicine. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2017; 196: 425–429.
  • 6. Mehta S, Rose L, Cook D, et al. The speaker gender gap at critical care conferences. Crit Care Med 2018; 46: 991–996.
  • 7. College of Intensive Care Medicine of Australia and New Zealand. Statement on gender balance within the College of Intensive Care Medicine. IC‐28 (2019). (viewed June 2019).
  • 8. Leigh JP, Grood C, Ahmed SB, et al. Toward gender equity in critical care medicine: a qualitative study of perceived drivers, implications, and strategies. Crit Care Med 2019; 47: e286–e291.
  • 9. Valian V. Why so slow? The advancement of women. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1998.
  • 10. Coe IR, Wiley R, Bekker LG. Organisational best practices towards gender equality in science and medicine. Lancet 2019; 393: 587–593.
  • 11. Salles A, Awad M, Goldin L, et al. Estimating implicit and explicit gender bias among health care professionals and surgeons. JAMA Network Open 2019; 2: e196545.
  • 12. Nonnemaker L. Women physicians in academic medicine: new insights from cohort studies. N Engl J Med 2000; 342: 399–405.
  • 13. Tesch BJ, Wood HM, Helwig AL, Nattinger AB. Promotion of women physicians in academic medicine. Glass ceiling or sticky floor? JAMA 1995; 273: 1022–1025.
  • 14. Jena AB, Khullar D, Ho O, et al. Sex differences in academic rank in US medical schools in 2014. JAMA 2015; 314: 1149–1158.
  • 15. Wennerås C, Wold A. Nepotism and sexism in peer‐review. Nature 1997; 387: 341–343.
  • 16. Witteman HO, Hendricks M, Straus S, Tannenbaum C. Are gender gaps due to evaluations of the applicant or the science? A natural experiment at a national funding agency. Lancet 2019; 393: 531–540.
  • 17. Royal Australasian College of Surgeons. 2018 progress report: Building respect, improving patient safety. Melbourne: RACS, 2018. (viewed June 2019).
  • 18. Besley T, Folke O, Persson T, Rickne J. Gender quotas and the crisis of the mediocre man: theory and evidence from Sweden. Am Econ Rev 2017; 107: 2204–2242.
  • 19. Whelan J, Wood R. Targets and quotas for women in leadership: a global review of policy, practice, and psychological research. Melbourne: Centre for Ethical Leadership, University of Melbourne, 2012. (viewed June 2019).
  • 20. Australian Institute of Company Directors. 30% by 2018: gender diversity progress report. September – December 2018 Quarterly Report, Volume 14. (viewed June 2019).
  • 21. Weiss B, Task Force and Working Groups for Diversity and Equality of the ESICM. Statement paper on diversity for the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM). Intensive Care Med 2019; 45: 1002–1005.
  • 22. Castilla EJ, Benard S. The paradox of meritocracy in organizations. Adm Sci Q 2010; 55: 543–576.
  • 23. Moss‐Racusin CA, Dovidio JF, Brescoll VL, et al. Science faculty's subtle gender biases favour male students. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012; 109: 16474–16479.
  • 24. Juster FR, Baum RC, Zou C, et al. Addressing the diversity‐validity dilemma using situational judgment tests. Acad Med 2019; 94: 1197–1203.
  • 25. Australian Government Workforce Gender Equity Agency. Towards gender‐balanced parental leave: Australian and international trends. Insight paper. Sydney: WGEA, 2017. (viewed June 2019).
  • 26. College of Intensive Care Medicine of Australia and New Zealand. Guidelines on practice re‐entry, re‐training and remediation for intensive care specialists. IC‐15 (2019).,-Retraining-and-Remediation_2.pdf (viewed June 2019).
  • 27. Venkatesh B, Corke C, Raper R, et al. Prevalence of bullying, discrimination and sexual harassment among trainees and Fellows of the College of Intensive Care Medicine of Australia and New Zealand. Crit Care Resusc 2016; 18: 230–234.


remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.