Nursing home “no returns” policy, when residents are discharged to the emergency department at 4 am: what does the law say?
Authors: Carmelle Peisah, Tiffany Jessop and Henry Brodaty
Published online: 6 May 2019
In reply
In reply: We thank Forbes and Ferraro for noting that rights around security of tenure in nursing homes apply equally to residents with mental illness as to those with dementia. As illustrated in the case presented by the authors, advocacy is particularly needed for residents with mental illness with the triple jeopardy of being aged, and having mental illness and dementia.1 A combination of stigma, lack of specialised expertise and inadequately resourced facilities may culminate in nursing homes seeking recourse to precipitous discharge for lack of other solutions, noting that hospitalisation rate per se is often used as a quality indicator of care in facilities.2 However, as we have previously noted, this practice is inconsistent with legislated guidelines under Division 2, User Rights Principles 2014 (section 96‐1, Aged Care Act 1997).3
Stigma occurs across all sectors — general hospital and mental health services are often loath to assist older patients in general and especially those with neurocognitive disorders. Forbes and Ferraro provide an example of the flip side of the coin: aged care services stigmatising older people with mental health problems, such stigma being a type of “mentalism” akin to ageism. As stated above, some of this stigma arises from lack of education and specialised input and services in nursing homes, and the fact that patients with mental illness often require more time from direct care staff, which has been shown to have an adverse effect on other residents.2
The struggle to optimise treatment and care of nursing home residents with mental illness has been noted since the early days of the deinstitutionalisation movement;4 all the more so now with initiatives such as the Pathways to Community Living Initiative. This initiative is a coordinated New South Wales state‐wide approach to supporting people, often elderly, with serious mental illness who have been hospitalised for more than 12 months to, when possible, re‐establish their lives in the community, often in residential care.5 As stated by Forbes and Ferraro, such a vulnerable population warrants greater support, as do the nursing homes that provide their care.
Ageism and mentalism should both be unacceptable to all health professionals, in all settings.
Competing interests
No relevant disclosures.
Acknowledgements
Our work in this area is supported by an Australian Government Dementia and Aged Care Services Fund grant.
References
- Peisah C, O'Neill N, Brodaty H. Mental health and human rights in the elderly. In: Dudley M, Silove D, Gale F, editors. Mental health and human rights: vision, praxis, and courage. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
- Rahman M, Grabowski DC, Intrator O, et al. Serious mental illness and nursing home quality of care. Health Serv Res 2012; 48: 1279–1298.
- Peisah C, Jessop T, Brodaty H. Nursing home “no returns” policy, when residents are discharged to the emergency department at 4 am: what does the law say? Med J Aust 2018; 209: 324. https://www.mja.com.au/journal/2018/209/7/nursing-home-no-returns-policy-when-residents-are-discharged-emergency
- Sherwood S, Mor V. Mental health institutions and the elderly. In: Birren JE, Sloane RB, editors. Handbook of mental health and aging. 2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1980.
- NSW Health. Pathways to Community Living – information for consumers and carers. https://www.health.nsw.gov.au/mentalhealth/pcli/Pages/default.aspx (viewed Dec 2018).
Linked content
-
MJA Letter: Nursing home “no returns” policy, when residents are discharged to the emergency department at 4 am: what does the law say?
-
MJA Letter: Nursing home “no returns” policy, when residents are discharged to the emergency department at 4 am: what does the law say?
Getting on the Same Page: Why Australia Needs a National Maternity Early Warning System (MEWS) Chart
Briony A. Cutts, Lucy Bowyer, Nisha Khot, Sandra Lowe, Stefan C. Kane
Data for Equity: Can Linked Administrative Data Inform Pathways to More Equitable Child Health?
Sarah Gray, Shuaijun Guo, Meredith O'Connor, Elodie O'Connor, Katrina Williams, Hannah Badland, Susan Woolfenden, Josie Dickerson, Gerry Redmond, Marnie Downes, Sharon R. Goldfeld
Specialty College Selection: Why Change is Critical to Support a Future Rural Workforce
Matthew R. McGrail, Jenny May AM, Katherine Logan
The number of cancer‐related deaths that could be attributable to spatial disparities in survival in Australia, 2010–2019: a retrospective population‐based cohort study
Charlotte K Bainomugisa, Jessica Cameron, Paramita Dasgupta, Peter Baade
Differentiated and simplified oral HIV pre‐exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) models hold the key to virtually eliminating HIV transmission in Australia by 2030
Tyson Arapali, Sarah Warzywoda, Anthony K J Smith, Curtis Chan, Timothy R Broady, Erin Sullivan, Catherine MacPhail, Mohamed A Hammoud, Alexander Dowell‐Day, Benjamin R Bavinton
Non‐technical errors associated with deaths in surgical care, Australia, 2012–2019, by surgical specialty (Australian and New Zealand Audit of Surgical Mortality): a retrospective cohort study
Jesse Ey, Victoria Kollias, Octavia Lee, Kelly Hou, Matheesha Herath, John B North, Ellie Treloar, Suzanne Edwards, Martin Bruening, Adam J Wells, Guy J Maddern