News briefs

Cate Swannell
Med J Aust 2018; 209 (4): . || doi: 10.5694/mja18.n2008
Published online: 20 August 2018

Griffith University researchers have compared dressings and securements for preventing peripheral intravenous catheter (PIVC) failure in adults, and published their results in The Lancet. PIVCs are the most common invasive medical devices used in hospitals; around 2 billion devices are sold around the world each year, and most patients admitted to hospital require intravenous therapy. PIVC failure is unacceptably frequent: as many as 69% of devices require removal because of dislodgement, pain, occlusion, leakage, or infection. The National Health and Medical Research Council funded the investigation at the Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital and the Princess Alexandra Hospital in Brisbane. In the trial, 1807 eligible patients aged 18 years or more who required PIVC insertion for longer than 24 hours were randomly assigned to receiving tissue adhesive with polyurethane dressing, bordered polyurethane dressing, a securement device with polyurethane dressing, or polyurethane dressing (control group). Overall, PIVC failure affected 41% of patients. None of the interventions significantly reduced PIVC failure; all tested products, including the standard polyurethane, were subject to PIVC failure and often needed reinforcement. The researchers wrote that innovations for achieving effective, durable products are urgently needed, but also that substantial savings could be made by the Australian health system were clinicians to use low cost polyurethane dressings for PIVCs, given the lack of a clinical rationale for more expensive products.

  • Cate Swannell



remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.