What have we learnt about using digital technologies in health professional education?

Helen Wozniak, Rachel H Ellaway and Peter GM de Jong
Med J Aust 2018; 209 (10): . || doi: 10.5694/mja18.00152
Published online: 19 November 2018

Informed use of digital learning technologies can contribute to effective learning experiences

The growing use of digital educational technologies in health professional education has mirrored the changes wrought by the digital revolution as a whole. However, while some activities in contemporary health professions education are almost exclusively mediated online (such as providing learning materials), others are still largely conducted face-to-face (such as supervision and assessment). Indeed, as the heat of the e-learning revolution has cooled,1 it has been replaced by a growing focus on integrating and sustaining the many technologies that learners, teachers and administrators now use. Despite this, the use of technology in health professions education is often ad hoc and reactive, rather than being purposive and strategic. In this article, we highlight some of the prevailing misconceptions surrounding the use of technology and recommend that educators and health professionals recognise that compromises are needed when designing technology-mediated educational experiences.

  • 1 Office of Medical Education, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD
  • 2 Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
  • 3 Center for Innovation in Medical Education, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands


Competing interests:

No relevant disclosures.

  • 1. Ellaway R. E-learning: is the revolution over? Med Teach 2011; 33: 297-302.
  • 2. Ellaway RH. Using digital technologies: In: Dent J, Harden R, Hunt D, editors. A practical guide for medical teachers. 5th ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 2017: 152-161.
  • 3. Nguyen T. The effectiveness of online learning: beyond no significant difference and future horizons. J Online Learning Teaching 2015; 11: 309-319.
  • 4. Cook DA. The failure of e-learning research to inform educational practice, and what we can do about it. Med Teach 2009; 31: 158-162.
  • 5. Bennett S, Maton K, Kervin L. The “digital natives” debate: a critical review of the evidence. Br J Educ Technol 2008; 39: 775-786.
  • 6. Wozniak H. Conjecture mapping to optimize the educational design research process. Australas J Educ Technol 2015; 31: 597-612.
  • 7. Bullock A, de Jong PGM. Technology-enhanced learning. In: Swanwick T, editor. Understanding medical education: evidence, theory and practice. 2nd ed. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell, 2014: 149-160.
  • 8. Ellaway RH, Coral J, Topps D, Topps MH. Exploring digital professionalism. Med Teach 2015; 37: 844-849.
  • 9. Scott KM, Baur L, Barrett J. Evidence-based principles for using technology-enhanced learning in the continuing professional development of health professionals. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2017; 37: 61-66.
  • 10. O’Reilly M, Lefoe G, Philip R, Parrish D. Designing for user engagement: the ALTC Exchange for higher education. Int J E-learning 2010; 9: 251-277.
  • 11. Anderson T. How communities of inquiry drive teaching and learning in the digital age. Canada: Contact North, 2017. (viewed Feb 2018).
  • 12. Sandars J, Patel R, Goh P, et al. The importance of educational theories for facilitating learning when using technology in medical education. Med Teach 2015; 37: 1039-1042.
  • 13. Reid HJ, Thomson C, McGlade KJ. Content and discontent: a qualitative exploration of obstacles to elearning engagement in medical students. BMC Med Educ 2016; 16: 188.
  • 14. Wozniak H, McEldowney R. Layers of transition: the lived experiences of online distance learners. In: Thomas T, Levin E, Dawson P, et al., editors. Research and development in higher education: learning for life and work in a complex world, Vol. 38. Melbourne: Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australia, 2015: pp 505-515. (viewed Feb 2018).
  • 15. Lockyer L, Heathcote E, Dawson S. Informing pedagogical action: aligning learning analytics with learning design. Am Behav Sci 2013; 57: 1439-1459.
  • 16. Ellaway R, Pusic M, Yavner S, Kalet A. Context matters: emergent variability in an effectiveness trial of online teaching modules. Med Educ 2014; 48: 386-396.
  • 17. Bower M. Design of technology-enhanced learning: Integrating research and practice. Bingley: Emerald Publishing, 2017.
  • 18. Adams BS, Cummins M, Davis A, et al. NMC Horizon Report: 2017 Higher Education Edition. Austin, TX: New Media Consortium, 2017. (viewed Apr 2018).


remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.