News

Volume 208 - Issue 9

News briefs

Author:  Cate Swannell

Med J Aust 2018; 208 (9): 375-376. || doi: 10.5694/mja18.n0521
Published online: 21 May 2018

Genetics throws light on darkness of depression

Researchers in the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium, which includes a number of Australian research groups, have identified genetic risk factors associated with major depression. Published in Nature Genetics, the international study identified 44 genetic variants associated with major depression, 30 of which were previously unknown. It analysed DNA from more than 135 000 people with major depressive disorders and more than 344 000 control samples. Australian researchers are now seeking to build on the study by recruiting volunteers who have been diagnosed with clinical depression. The Australian Genetics of Depression Study is seeking volunteers who have been diagnosed with clinical depression to complete an online survey and potentially provide a saliva sample. One of the lead authors, Professor Nick Martin of Brisbane’s QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, said that the study’s aim was to identify additional genetic markers of depression. “Depression is very complex from a genetic point of view, so the more people we can recruit into the study, the more in depth information we will have to advance our understanding of this common, but debilitating, disease,” he said. “Our new study involves asking people about their experience with antidepressants with the aim of finding genetic factors that contribute to the effectiveness of these medicines for individuals. Our eventual aim is to develop improved treatments and also to recommend antidepressants for individuals, based on their genetic make-up, to avoid the potentially long and distressing process of experimenting to find the correct medicine and dosage.”

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41588-018-0090-3

Neanderthal skulls hold key to their disappearance

The structure of Neanderthals’ brains may have affected their social and cognitive abilities and contributed to their replacement by Homo sapiens, according to a study in Scientific Reports. Japanese researchers analysed virtual casts of four Neanderthal and four early Homo sapiens skull fossils to reconstruct the size of their brains. The authors also used magnetic resonance imaging data for the brains of 1185 people to model the average modern human brain. This computer model was then deformed to match the shape of the skull casts, which allowed the researchers to predict what the brains of early Homo sapiens and Neanderthals may have looked like and how individual brain regions may have differed between the two species. The authors found that the brains of early Homo sapiens were not larger than those of Neanderthals; their morphologies were significantly different, including a larger cerebellum and a smaller occipital region in the cerebrum in Homo sapiens. On the basis of data from 1095 participants, the authors examined the relationship between cerebellar volume and abilities such as language comprehension and production, working memory, and cognitive flexibility. Their findings suggest that the differences in the brains of early Homo sapiens meant they may have had superior cognitive and social abilities to Neanderthals. This may have affected early humans’ ability to adapt to changing environments, increasing their chances of survival compared with those of the Neanderthals.

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-24331-0


Author