Australia urgently needs a quality improvement approach to emergency laparotomy

Katherine J Broughton and Robert J Aitken
Med J Aust 2018; 208 (2): . || doi: 10.5694/mja17.00793
Published online: 27 November 2017

A prospective quality improvement register will reduce variations in outcomes and care following emergency laparotomy

A patient presenting to an Australian emergency department with symptoms of acute coronary syndrome will have their presumptive diagnosis, immediate medical treatment and definitive interventional treatment (eg, angioplasty within 90 minutes of arrival) fast tracked by following an agreed, evidence-based pathway that can be monitored for compliance. The 30-day mortality following angioplasty is 2%, but all patients will be admitted to a coronary care unit.1 There are equivalent pathways for patients presenting with stroke.2

  • 1 Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
  • 2 Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, WA


Competing interests:

No relevant disclosures.

  • 1. Chew DP, Scott IA, Cullen L, et al. National Heart Foundation of Australia and Cardiac Society of Australian and New Zealand: Australian Clinical Guidelines for the Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes 2016. Heart Lung Circ 2016: 25; 897-950.
  • 2. Stroke Foundation. Clinical guidelines for stroke management 2017. (accessed Oct 2017).
  • 3. Rhodes A, Evan LE, Alhazzani W, et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for the management of sepsis and septic shock, 2016. Crit Care Med 2017: 45; 486-552.
  • 4. Pearse RM, Harrison DA, James P, et al. Identification and characterization of the high-risk surgical population in the United Kingdom. Crit Care Med 2006; 10: R81.
  • 5. Symons NR, Moorthy K, Almoudaris AM, et al. Mortality in high-risk emergency general surgical admissions. Br J Surg 2013; 100: 1318-1325.
  • 6. Saunders DI, Murray D, Pichel AC, et al. Variations in mortality after emergency laparotomy: the first report of the UK Emergency Laparotomy Network. Br J Anaesth 2012; 109: 368-375.
  • 7. Broughton K, Aldridge O, Pradham S, Aitken RJ. The Perth Emergency Laparotomy Audit. ANZ J Surg 2017; [Epub ahead of print].
  • 8. Huddart S, Peden CJ, Swart M, et al. Use of a pathway quality improvement care bundle to reduce mortality after emergency laparotomy. Br J Surg 2015; 102: 57-66.
  • 9. Tengberg LT, Bay-Nielsen M, Bisgaard T, et al. Multidisciplinary perioperative protocol in patients undergoing acute high-risk abdominal surgery. Br J Surg 2017; 98: 802-810.
  • 10. NELA Project Team. Third patient report of National Emergency Laparotomy Audit. London: Royal College of Anaesthetists, 2017. (accessed Oct 2017).
  • 11. Royal College of Surgeons. The higher risk general surgical patient: towards improved care for a forgotten group. London: RCS, 2011. (accessed Aug 2017).
  • 12. Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care. Surgical interventions. In: Second Australian atlas of healthcare variation. Sydney: ACSQHC, 2017.Chapter 4. (accessed Oct 2017).
  • 13. Burrell AR, McLaws M-L, Fullick M, et al. SEPSIS KILLS: early intervention saves lives. Med J Aust 2016; 204: 73. <MJA full text>
  • 14. Detering K, Hancock AD, Reade MC, Silvester W. The impact of advance care planning on end of life care in elderly patients: randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2010; 340: c1345.
  • 15. Royal Australasian College of Surgeons. Audits of surgical mortality. (accessed Aug 2017).


remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.