Medical education research: aligning design and research goals

Jennifer A Cleland, Steven J Durning and Erik Driessen
Med J Aust 2018; 208 (11): . || doi: 10.5694/mja17.00941
Published online: 18 June 2018

Given that the training of doctors started some 2000 years ago, one might think that everything that needs to be known about medical education is long known. Not so. Times change and so do practice, society, health care systems and patient expectations. There are also shifts in how we deliver education, and in training linked to changing health care practices and systems (eg, limits on hours of training).1 Moreover, our knowledge of what constitutes good clinical practice is constantly evolving.2

  • 1 Centre for Healthcare Education Research and Innovation, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
  • 2 Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA
  • 3 Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands


Competing interests:

No relevant disclosures.

  • 1. Australian Medical Association. Managing the risks of fatigue in the medical workforce: 2016 AMA safe hours audit. 15 July 2017. (viewed Apr 2018).
  • 2. Chin L, Satell G. How physicians can keep up with the knowledge explosion in medicine. Harvard Business Review 2016; 19 Dec. (viewed Apr 2018).
  • 3. Cooke M, Irby DM, O’Brien B. A summary of educating physicians: a call for reform of medical school and residency. Jossey-Bass, 2010. (viewed Jan 2018).
  • 4. Lingard L. Joining a conversation: the problem/gap/hook heuristic. Perspect Med Educ 2015; 4: 252-253.
  • 5. Scrimgeour DSG, Cleland JA, Lee AP, et al. Impact of performance in a mandatory postgraduate surgical examination on selection into specialty training. BJS Open 2017; 1: 67-74.
  • 6. Dong T, Zahn C, Saguil A, et al. The associations between clerkship objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) grades and subsequent performance. Teach Learn Med 2017; 29: 280-285.
  • 7. Driessen EW, Muijtijens AMM, van Tartwijk J, van der Vleuten CPM. Web- or paper-based portfolios: is there a difference? Med Educ 2007; 41: 1067-1073.
  • 8. Gingerich A, van der Vleuten CPM, Eva KW, Regehr G. More consensus than idiosyncrasy: categorizing social judgments to examine variability in Mini-CEX Ratings. Acad Med 2014; 89: 1510-1519.
  • 9. Becker HS, Greer B, Hughes EC. Boys in white: student culture in medical school. London: Transaction Publishers, 1961.
  • 10. Hawick L, Cleland JA, Kitto S. Getting off the carousel: exploring the wicked problem of curriculum reform. Perspect Med Educ 2017; 6: 337-343.
  • 11. Teunissen PW, Scheele F, Scherpbier AJ, et al. How residents learn: qualitative evidence for the pivotal role of clinical activities, Med Educ 2007; 41: 763-770.
  • 12. Crotty M. The foundations of social research: meaning and perspective in the research process. London: Sage Publications, 1998.
  • 13. Cleland JA. Exploring versus measuring: considering the fundamental differences between qualitative and quantitative research. In: Cleland JA, Durning SJ, editors. Researching medical education. Oxford: Wiley, 2015.
  • 14. Watson K, Wright A, Morris N, et al. Can simulation replace part of clinical time? Two parallel randomised controlled trials. Med Educ 2012; 46: 657-667.
  • 15. Fraser K, Ma I, Teteris E, et al. Emotion, cognitive load and learning outcomes during simulation training. Med Educ 2012; 46: 1055-1062.
  • 16. Cook DA. Randomized controlled trials and meta-analysis in medical education: what role do they play? Med Teach 2012; 34: 468-473.
  • 17. Creswell JW. Educational research: planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. 4th ed. Boston: Pearson, 2013.
  • 18. O’Leary Z. Researching real-world problems. London: Sage Publications, 2005: pp. 23-38.
  • 19. McMillan W. Theory in healthcare education research: the importance of worldview. In: Cleland JA, Durning SJ, editors. Researching medical education. Oxford: Wiley, 2015.
  • 20. Fischer CT. Bracketing in qualitative research: conceptual and practical matters. Psychother Res 2009; 19: 583-590.
  • 21. Stake RE. The art of case study research. London: Sage Publications, 1995.
  • 22. Punch KF. Introduction to social research: quantitative and qualitative approaches. London: Sage Publications, 1998.
  • 23. Patton MQ. Qualitative research and evaluation methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2002.
  • 24. Cresswell JW, Plano Clark VL. Designing and conducting mixed method research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2011.
  • 25. Miles MB, Huberman AM. Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1994.
  • 26. Guba E, Lincoln Y. Effective evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1981.


remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.