Generalist training may be a solution for responding to future population health needs
Health care needs are changing due to the rapidly ageing population and the increasing number of patients with long term conditions and comorbidities.1 This has occurred at a time of continuing maldistribution of the medical workforce in Australia and increased specialisation and subspecialisation within the medical profession and the medical education system. As the next generation of doctors will need to serve an older population and those with more than one condition, a more useful focus would be “much less on narrow disease silos and … more on the breadth of possible permutations of co-morbidity”.1 Long periods of training and increasing subspecialism may also lead to difficulty in changing the scope of practice in times of surplus or reluctance to move to geographic areas with medical workforce shortages.2 For example, despite increasing numbers of medical graduates in Australia, there are existing shortages in generalist specialties, such as general practice, general medicine and psychiatry, and many rural communities still have reduced access to medical care compared with urban populations.2 Do current models and degree of specialisation encountered in medical training optimally prepare physicians to serve the needs of all patients?
- 1. Finlay I, Shepherd S, Cayton H, et al. Guiding patients through complexity: modern medical generalism. Report of an independent commission for the Royal College of General Practitioners and the Health Foundation. London: Health Foundation, 2011. http://www.health.org.uk/publication/guiding-patients-through-complexity-modern-medical-generalism (accessed June 2016).
- 2. Scott A, Joyce CM. The future of medical careers. Med J Aust 2014; 201: 82-83. <MJA full text>
- 3. Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Report of the generalism and generalist task force. Ottawa: Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada, 2013. http://www.royalcollege.ca/rcsite/documents/educational-strategy-accreditation/ccc-task-force-report-july-2013-e.pdf (accessed May, 2015).
- 4. Reeves J, Blakeman T, Freeman G, et al. Generalist solutions to complex problems: generating practice-based evidence — the example of managing multi-morbidity. BMC Fam Pract 2013; 14: 112.
- 5. General Medical Council. The state of medical education and practice in the UK. London: GMC, 2012. http://www.gmc-uk.org/The_state_of_medical_education_and_practice_in_the_UK_2012_0912.pdf_49843330.pdf (accessed May 2015).
- 6. Colyer S. Subspecialists hold back generalists. MJA InSight 2014; 21 July. http://www.doctorportal.com.au/mjainsight/2014/26/subspecialties-hold-back-generalists
- 7. Albritton W, Bates J, Brazeau M, et al. Generalism versus subspecialization: changes necessary in medical education. Can J Rural Med 2006; 11: 126-128.
- 8. Hudson JN, Weston KM, Farmer EA. Engaging rural preceptors in new longitudinal community clerkships during workforce shortage: a qualitative study. BMC Fam Pract 2011; 12: 103.
- 9. Van Der Weyden MB. New medical school with a clear vision. Med J Aust 2007; 186: 217. <MJA full text>
- 10. Strasser R, Hogenbirk JC, Minore B, et al. Transforming health professional education through social accountability: Canada’s Northern Ontario School of Medicine. Med Teach 2013; 35 490-496.
- 11. Hudson JN, Knight PJ, Weston KM. Patient perceptions of innovative longitudinal integrated clerkships based in regional, rural and remote primary care: a qualitative study. BMC Fam Pract 2012; 13: 72.
- 12. Van Der Weyden MB. Expanding primary care-based medical education: a renaissance of general practice? Med J Aust 2007; 187: 66-67. <MJA full text>
- 13. Garne D, Wilson M, Wilson IG. Rural clinical school outcomes: what is success and how long do we wait for it? Med J Aust 2014; 201: 575. <MJA full text>
- 14. Murray to the Mountains. Intern Program [website]. www.m2m.asn.au/for-interns/program.html (accessed Aug 2016).
- 15. Ahern SF, Morley PT, McColl GJ. Governing the reform of the medical internship. Med J Aust 2016; 204: 374-375. <MJA full text>
Publication of your online response is subject to the Medical Journal of Australia's editorial discretion. You will be notified by email within five working days should your response be accepted.