Rural clinical school outcomes: what is success and how long do we wait for it?

David Garne, Mark Wilson and Ian G Wilson
Med J Aust 2014; 201 (10): . || doi: 10.5694/mja14.00965
Published online: 17 November 2014

To the Editor: Do we sense a touch of frustration in the letter from Adam and colleagues1 in describing the outcomes of their rural clinical school (RCS) program? Career choices within medicine are influenced by many factors, and we agree with their comment that it is impossible to compel and unreasonable to expect all RCS graduates to enter rural practice. However, a factor that they have not taken into account is that of rural student recruitment, which has been shown by numerous studies, together with a positive rural exposure during training, to be a major factor in rural career decision making.2-5 If, as they suggest, currently only half of RCS graduates can be expected to choose a rural career, with the present requirement for medical schools to admit 25% of their intake from a rural background, is it time for this requirement to be reviewed upward?

  • David Garne
  • Mark Wilson
  • Ian G Wilson

  • Graduate School of Medicine, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW.


Competing interests:

No relevant disclosures.


remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.