Adaptation of a biobank certification program for Australia
Authors: Jane E Carpenter, Amanda Rush and Candace Carter
Published online: 17 April 2017
Biobanking involves the collection, processing, storage and distribution of biospecimens and data, and, in recent years, it has rapidly evolved to become an integral component in biomedical research.1 Biobanks may range in complexity from a single researcher storing their own material to large stores of material used by multiple researchers. This diversity has complicated the standardisation of biobanking practices,2,3 sometimes compromising biospecimen quality and storage capacity4 and the security of funding. In turn, irreproducible research results, poor biospecimen access and decreased public confidence may ensue.4
Therefore, New South Wales Health Pathology — a statewide clinical diagnostic service — has adapted and launched a Biobank Certification Program in conjunction with the Canadian Office of Biobank Education and Research and the Canadian Tissue Repository Network, where the program has been operating successfully for 4 years.5 This voluntary program aims to improve the quality of biobanking practices and raise standards through the provision of education modules and document templates. To encourage participation, the program is free for NSW biobanks and associated pathology laboratories for the first year. Nominal fees will subsequently apply for non-NSW Health organisations.
Certification requires the biobank or pathology leader to register details of the biobank and complete (with team members) up to nine pertinent education modules, submit a declaration of compliance to adhere to best practices and upload key documents for auditor review. Moreover, biobanks may also opt to be listed on a publically available biobank locator.
The program is designed as a first step towards improving the quality of biobanks for stakeholders, including researchers, multicentre trials, ethics committees, funders and the public. Current biobank practices are diverse, making a formal accreditation system impractical for some biobanks to undertake. It is envisaged that the program — subject to evaluation and uptake of staff education modules — may provide a foundation for a future accreditation program. Further information is available at https://nsw.biobanking.org.
Competing interests
References
- Gedye C, Fleming J. Forsaking cures for cancer: why are we discarding the tumour biospecimens of most patients? Med J Aust 2016; 204: 297-298.
- Rush A, Byrne JA. Quality and reporting practices in an Australian cancer biobank cohort. Clin Biochem 2016; 49: 492-497.
- Moore HM. Moving toward biospecimen harmonization with evidence-based practices. Biopreserv Biobank 2014; 12: 79-80.
- Simeon-Dubach D, Watson P. Biobanking 3.0: evidence based and customer focused biobanking. Clin Biochem 2014; 47: 300-308.
- Barnes RO, Shea KE, Watson PH. The Canadian Tissue Repository Network Biobank Certification and the College of American Pathologists Biorepository Accreditation programs: two strategies for knowledge dissemination in biobanking. Biopreserv Biobank 2016; 15: 9-16.