Connect
MJA
MJA

Centralising care for patients with pancreatic cancer: a hybrid model approach

Robert C Gandy and Koroush Haghighi
Med J Aust 2017; 206 (1): . || doi: 10.5694/mja16.00903
Published online: 16 January 2017

Reducing regional variations in treatment rates for pancreatic cancer requires an inclusive, standardised approach and cooperation

The successful treatment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma with curative intent depends on a number of factors: the patient must present to a medical service for investigation, the appropriate investigations for diagnosing and staging the disease must be undertaken, and curative surgery and adjuvant therapy must then be considered in an appropriate setting.


  • Prince of Wales Hospital and Community Health Services, Sydney, NSW


Correspondence: robertgandy@hotmail.com

Competing interests:

No relevant disclosures.

  • 1. Burmeister E, Waterhouse M, Jordan S, et al. Determinants of survival and attempted resection in patients with non-metastatic pancreatic cancer: an Australian population-based study. Pancreatology 2016; doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2016.06.010 [Epub ahead of print].
  • 2. Melo SA, Luecke LB, Kahlert C, et al. Glypican-1 identifies cancer exosomes and detects early pancreatic cancer. Nature 2015; 523: 177-182.
  • 3. Radon TP, Massat NJ, Jones R, et al. Identification of a three-biomarker panel in urine for early detection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 2015; 21: 3512-3521.
  • 4. Gandy RC, Barbour AP, Samra J, et al. Refining the care of patients with pancreatic cancer: the AGITG Pancreatic Cancer Workshop consensus. Med J Aust 2016; 204: 419-422. <MJA full text>
  • 5. Creighton N, Walton R, Roder DM, et al. Pancreatectomy is underused in NSW regions with low surgical volumes: a population data linkage study. Med J Aust 2017; 206: 23-29.
  • 6. Marlow N, Maddern G, Barraclough B, et al. Centralisation of selected surgical procedures: implications for Australia (Australian Safety and Efficacy Register of New Interventional Procedures – Surgical report no. 57). Adelaide: ASERNIP-S, 2007. https://www.surgeons.org/media/310845/Centralisation_systematicreview.pdf (accessed Aug 2016).
  • 7. Burmeister EA, O’Connell DL, Beasley VL, et al. Describing patterns in pancreatic cancer: a population-based study. Pancreas 2015; 44: 1259-1265.
  • 8. Finlayson SR, Birkmeyer JD, Tosteson AN, Nease RF. Patient preferences for location of care: implications for regionalization. Med Care 1999; 37: 204-209.
  • 9. Gandy R, Ling A, Hook H, Haghighi KS. Reciprocal care arrangements in HPB cancer services; helping swallow the bitter pill of centralisation [abstract]. HPB 2016; 18 Suppl 1: e539.
  • 10. Jackson K, Glasgow RE, Mone MC, et al. Does travel distance influence length of stay in elective pancreatic surgery? HPB (Oxford) 2014; 16: 543-549.

Author

remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Comment
Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.