Introducing an accessible series on statistics for clinicians

John R Attia and Michael P Jones
Med J Aust 2016; 205 (9): . || doi: 10.5694/mja16.00981
Published online: 7 November 2016

For many clinicians, statistics is the equivalent of a foreign language: they may know a few words here and there from their travels, but they have never had the time to learn the language properly. As health care providers, we are increasingly being asked to engage in critical appraisal and sort through the large volume of research to help guide decision making. For many, this means reading mainly the abstract and the discussion, and glossing over the jargon in the methods and results. This is unfortunate, as the methods can obviously make or break the validity of the results and determine whether we decide that a study is valid and practice changing, or fatally flawed and pointless.

  • John R Attia1,2,3
  • Michael P Jones4

  • 1 Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW
  • 2 John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, NSW
  • 3 Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, NSW
  • 4 Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW


Competing interests:

No relevant disclosures.


remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.