Non-reimbursement for preventable health care-acquired conditions

Christopher Davis
Med J Aust 2016; 205 (1): . || doi: 10.5694/mja16.00364
Published online: 4 July 2016

The response from Swan to my article is appreciated. I find concerning the insights on how third-party managed care might have an adverse impact on patient rights and good medical practice. For example, Swan infers that subtotal compliance with antibiotic guidelines for caesarean deliveries is a quality concern. In scheduled caesarean deliveries, 100 patients must receive prophylactic antibiotics to avoid one infection-related complication.1 Material risks, such as anaphylaxis, plus uncertain consequences for the infant, must be disclosed. Accordingly, respect for informed decision making by mothers-to-be might better explain and justify a ceiling to guide uptake.

  • Christopher Davis

  • Private Practice, Brisbane, QLD


Competing interests:

No relevant disclosures.


remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.