Objective: Analysis of data from the Burns Registry of Australia and New Zealand (BRANZ) to determine the extent of variation between participating units in treatment and in specific outcomes during the first 4 years of its operation.
Design: BRANZ, an initiative of the Australian and New Zealand Burn Association, is a clinical quality registry developed in accordance with the Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Healthcare national operating principles.
Setting: Patients with burn injury who fulfil pre-defined criteria are transferred to and managed in designated burn units. There are 17 adult and paediatric units in Australia and New Zealand that manage almost all patients with significant burn injury. Twelve of these units treat adult patients.
Participants: Data on 7184 adult cases were contributed by ten acute adult burn units to the registry between July 2010 and June 2014.
Major outcomes: In-hospital mortality, hospital length of stay, skin grafting rates, and rates of admission to intensive care units.
Results: Considerable variations in unit profiles (including numbers of patients treated), in treatment and in outcomes were identified.
Conclusions: Despite the highly centralised delivery of care to patients with severe or complex burn injury, and the relatively small number of specialist burn units, we found significant variation between units in clinical management and in outcomes. BRANZ data from its first 4 years of operation support its feasibility and the value of further development of the registry. Based on these results, the focus of ongoing research is to improve understanding of the reasons for variations in practice and of their effect on outcomes for patients, and to develop evidence-informed clinical guidelines for burn management in Australia and New Zealand.
- 1. Ahn SC, Maitz PKM. The true cost of burn. Burns 2012; 38: 967-974.
- 2. Sanchez JLA, Bastida JL, Martinez MM, et al. Socio-economic cost and health-related quality of life of burn victims in Spain. Burns 2008; 34: 975-981.
- 3. Danilla S, Wasiak J, Searle S, et al. Methodological quality of randomised controlled trials in burns care: a systematic review. Burns 2009; 35: 956-961.
- 4. Taylor SL, Lee D, Nagler T, et al. A validity review of the National Burn Repository. Burn Care Res 2013; 34: 274-280.
- 5. UK National Burn Care Group. UK burn injury data 1986–2007 inc. International Burn Injury Database, 2008. http://www.ibidb.org/downloads/doc_download/4-2008-first-ibid-report (accessed Mar 2015).
- 6. Gabbe BJ, Cleland HJ, Cameron PA. Profile, transport and outcomes of severe burns patients within an inclusive, regionalized trauma system. ANZ J Surg 2011; 81: 725-730.
- 7. Watterson D, Gabbe BJ, Cleland HJ, et al. Developing the first bi-national clinical quality registry for burns — lessons learned so far. Burns 2012; 38: 52-60.
- 8. Watterson D, Cleland H, Darton A, et al. Developing clinical quality indicators for a bi-national burn registry. Burns 2011; 37: 1296-1308.
- 9. Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care. Strategic and operating principles for clinical quality registries [website]. http://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/our-work/information-strategy/clinical-quality-registries/strategic-operating-principles-for-clinical-quality-registries/ (accessed Nov 2014).
- 10. Olver IN. Opting in for opt-out consent. Med J Aust 2014; 200: 201-202. <MJA full text>
- 11. Australian and New Zealand Burn Association. Annual report. 1st July 2013 – 30th June 2014. http://anzba.org.au/assets/BRANZ_AnnualReportYear5_Final1.pdf (accessed Mar 2015).
- 12. American Burn Association. National Burn Repository 2012 report. Dataset version 8.0. http://www.ameriburn.org/2012NBRAnnualReport.pdf (accessed Aug 2015).
- 13. Ong YS, Samuel M, Song C. Meta-analysis of early excision of burns. Burns 2006; 32: 145-150.
- 14. Mackie DP. Inhalation injury or mechanical ventilation: which is the true killer in burn patients? Burns 2013; 39: 1329-1330.
- 15. McNamee JJ, Pilcher DV, Bailey MJ, et al. Mortality prediction and outcomes among burns patients from Australian and New Zealand intensive care units. Crit Care Resusc 2010; 12: 196-201.
Publication of your online response is subject to the Medical Journal of Australia's editorial discretion. You will be notified by email within five working days should your response be accepted.