Opting in for opt-out consent

Ian N Olver
Med J Aust 2014; 200 (4): . || doi: 10.5694/mja13.10695
Published online: 3 March 2014

A place for opt-out consent in the National statement on ethical conduct in human research

In most human research, potential participants are provided with detailed information so that they can make a fully informed choice about whether to participate in the project. The requirement for explicit consent reflects the value that our society places on individual autonomy.

  • Cancer Council Australia, Sydney, NSW.


Competing interests:

No relevant disclosures.

  • 1. Gill MB. Presumed consent, autonomy and organ donation. J Med Philos 2004; 29: 37-59.
  • 2. SA Department of Health. Code of Fair Information Practice. 2004. (accessed Feb 2011).
  • 3. Olver IN, Whitford HS, Denson LA, et al. Improving informed consent to chemotherapy: a randomized controlled trial of written information versus an interactive multimedia CD-ROM. Patient Educ Couns 2009; 74: 197-204.
  • 4. Evans SM, Bohensky M, Cameron PA, McNeil J. A survey of Australian clinical registries: can quality of care be measured? Intern Med J 2011; 41: 42-48. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2009.02068.x.
  • 5. Gershon AS, Tu JV. The effect of privacy legislation on observational research. CMAJ 2008; 178: 871-873.
  • 6. Victorian Department of Health. Victorian State Trauma Registry. (accessed Apr 2013).
  • 7. Berry JG, Ryan P, Braunack-Mayer AJ, et al; Vaccine Assessment Using Linked Data (VALiD) Working Group. A randomised controlled trial to compare opt-in and opt-out parental consent for childhood vaccine safety surveillance using data linkage: study protocol. Trials 2011; 12: 1.
  • 8. Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care. Operating principles and technical standards for Australian clinical quality registries. Sydney: ACSQHC, 2008.
  • 9. Giesbertz NA, Bredenoord AL, van Delden JJ. A thick opt-out is often sufficient. Am J Bioeth 2013; 13: 44-46.
  • 10. Beeke C, Olver IN, McLaughlin K. A survey of patients’ attitudes towards the use of their health data. J Registry Manag 2007; 34: 119-122.


remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.