Connect
MJA
MJA

Developing competence in biostatistics and research methodology during medical specialty training

Sandra L Turner and Tim Shaw
Med J Aust 2016; 204 (2): . || doi: 10.5694/mja15.00470
Published online: 1 February 2016

Do we equip junior specialists with the skills to conduct research throughout their careers?

The application of an evidence-based approach to patient care underpins modern clinical practice for all medical disciplines. In many specialty training programs, there has been emphasis in recent years on ensuring that trainees develop the skills needed to interpret medical literature and conduct research, as a part of overall training. In turn, it is hoped that these abilities will instil in trainees the capacity and enthusiasm to continue taking an active part in clinical research over their careers. In addition, specialist doctors are ideally placed to direct efforts towards medical education research and research on translation of evidence to practice. In this article, we focus on the need to assist trainees in attaining foundation skills required for participation in research activities, ideally as a stepping stone to leadership in research. This is distinct from looking at tools and strategies (such as journal clubs and critically appraised topic instruments) used to teach critical appraisal of published evidence, although all these concepts are closely linked.1


  • 1 Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW
  • 2 University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW



Competing interests:

No relevant disclosures.

  • 1. Horsley T, Hyde C, Santesso N, et al. Teaching critical appraisal skills in healthcare settings. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011; (11): CD001270.
  • 2. Windish DM, Huot SJ, Green ML. Medicine residents’ understanding of the biostatistics and results in the medical literature. JAMA 2007; 298: 1010-1022.
  • 3. Freeman J, Collier S, Staniforth D, Smith K. Innovations in curriculum design: a multi-disciplinary approach to teaching statistics to undergraduate medical students. BMC Med Educ 2008; 8: 28.
  • 4. Ioannidis J, Greenland S, Hlatky M, et al. Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis. Lancet 2014; 383: 166-175.
  • 5. Franks J. The CanMEDS initiative: implementing an outcomes-based framework of physician competencies. Med Teach 2007; 29: 642-647.
  • 6. Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists. RANZCR Radiation Oncology Training Program Curriculum. http://www.ranzcr.edu.au/radiation-oncology/training-in-radiation-oncology (accessed Nov 2015).
  • 7. Royal Australasian College of Physicians. Medical oncology advanced training curriculum — adult medicine division. 2013. https://members.racp.edu.au/page/advanced-curricula (accessed Nov 2015).
  • 8. Ologunde R, Di Salvo I, Khajuria A. The CanMEDS scholar: the neglected competency in tomorrow’s doctors. Adv Med Educ Pract 2014; 5: 383-384.
  • 9. Australia and Asia Pacific Clinical Oncology Research Development Initiative. ACORD 2016 Workshop. http://acord.org.au/index.asp (accessed Nov 2015).
  • 10. Royal Australasian College of Surgeons. Critical Literature Evaluation and Research (CLEAR). http://www.surgeons.org/for-health-professionals/register-courses-events/skills-training-courses/clear (accessed Nov 2015).
  • 11. Thiruthaneeswaran N, Turner S, Milross C, Gogna K. Promoting a research culture among junior radiation oncologists: outcomes from the introduction of the Australian and New Zealand research requirement in training. Clin Oncol 2014; 26: 162-173.

Author

remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Comment
Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.