World No Tobacco Day reminds us of the desolating effects of smoking on health

Stephen Leeder
Med J Aust 2015; 202 (9): 455. || doi: 10.5694/mja15.c0518
Published online: 18 May 2015

In 2004 at Columbia University in New York, I worked with colleagues assessing the economic effects of heart disease in developing economies. I was invited to Washington, DC to address young economists from the International Monetary Fund (IMF) about tobacco as a contributor to vascular disease in sub-Saharan Africa and South America.

In DC, I was not among friends. Six young men in suits armed with data generated by mathematical models of intimidating complexity told me that tobacco was good for the [economic] health of evolving economies. It was easily grown; there was always a market; and governments loved it as a stable source of tax. Health consequences did not feature in their models — and so our meeting, though courteous, was brief.

Fast forward to Melbourne, August 2010, and the 63rd United Nations-auspiced international conference of non-government organisations (NGOs) working in developing economies on health and welfare. The theme was “Advance global health: achieve the millennium development goals”.

Despite the theme being like a slogan from the Chinese cultural revolution, the discussions were lively, open and constructive. Development was discussed from social, financial and political angles; but when tobacco was mentioned, quietness descended. Most representatives of the NGOs would say nothing bad about tobacco, because they had come to depend on tobacco companies' largesse as governments, strapped by the global financial crisis, struggled for air.

We must resist fatigue and build on success

Tobacco is talked about so much that there is a serious risk of complacency, despite current estimates that one billion people will die from tobacco-related diseases this century.1 Many will die of cardiovascular disease, and in the developing world one-third of these will be people aged less than 65 years.2

But the tobacco epidemic contains stories of success even though set against a dismal global backdrop. World Bank modelling has shown that wherever tobacco is taxed, consumption falls, government revenue increases and tobacco farming can be changed to cultivate food.3 The World Bank model applies whatever the national income; raising taxes has worked in low- and middle-income countries such as South Africa, Egypt and Turkey.4

We must sustain the international response

The World Health Organization's first international treaty has been the most successful international response to the global epidemic of tobacco-related diseases.5 As the culmination of about 50 years of policy work in relation to tobacco, the Framework Convention for Tobacco Control (FCTC)6 came into force in 2005 with 168 signatory countries. It was supported by many agencies including the IMF (yes), World Bank, UNICEF, several pharmaceutical companies and international health NGOs.7 The 2011 high-level United Nations summit on non-communicable diseases resulted in a specific commitment to reduce tobacco use through accelerated implementation of the FCTC.8 Now, 180 nations representing 89.4% of the world's population are parties to the treaty.9

The FCTC has two arms. The first comprises demand-side controls covering pricing and taxation, and non-price tactics to protect people from others' smoke and to regulate packaging and labelling, advertising and sponsorship. Supply-side measures — the second arm — are especially difficult to enact. Derek Yach, a principal contributor to the development of the treaty, writes on its tenth anniversary that

state monopolies led from China, Indonesia and India are poised to soon be the dominant manufacturers by volume of traditional tobacco products. Implementation of the FCTC will be tougher as state monopolies' power grows — as it is in the very countries where prevalence remains extremely high or increasing.7

We must not rest on our laurels

Australia ranks highly in the success of its tobacco control strategies. The prevalence of smoking in Australia has fallen from 72% in men in 194510 to 15% now.11 The residual risks of smoking from years ago, together with those accruing to current smokers, mean there are about 15 000 tobacco-associated deaths a year in Australia.12 Plain packaging is having an effect, and social mores have changed.

From here, ensuring the availability of high-quality information about tobacco and smoking through social media to assist young people to make informed choices makes good sense. New products such as e-cigarettes should be viewed with scepticism, especially given the tobacco companies' enthusiasm for them. Water-pipe smoking, for example, is enjoying a vogue in Australia13 and its health effects have been documented by the WHO.14 Support for smokers who wish to quit may not need to be extensive to be effective.

This is not an unwinnable battle.

  • Stephen Leeder

  • Menzies Centre for Health Policy, Sydney.


remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.