Connect
MJA
MJA

Sentinel lymph node biopsy for melanoma: an important risk-stratification tool

David E Gyorki and Michael A Henderson
Med J Aust 2014; 201 (8): . || doi: 10.5694/mja14.00645
Published online: 20 October 2014

This test should be routinely considered for patients with intermediate thickness melanoma

Most patients with a new diagnosis of melanoma present with localised disease without clinical evidence of metastasis and are cured by surgical resection. However, a small proportion will harbour occult metastatic disease in the regional lymph nodes. The presence of nodal involvement is the most significant prognostic factor in patients without clinical evidence of distant metastasis.1 The most sensitive test to identify these patients at presentation is sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB).1,2 The sentinel lymph node is the first draining lymph node from the area of skin where the primary tumour arose. The technique was first described over 20 years ago.3 Careful histological examination of the sentinel lymph node by a combination of routine histological and immunohistochemistry tests can accurately identify small-volume metastatic disease.


  • Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC.


Correspondence: david.gyorki@petermac.org

Competing interests:

No relevant disclosures.

  • 1. Balch CM, Gershenwald JE, Soong SJ, et al. Final version of 2009 AJCC melanoma staging and classification. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27: 6199-6206.
  • 2. Morton DL, Thompson JF, Cochran AJ, et al. Final trial report of sentinel-node biopsy versus nodal observation in melanoma. N Engl J Med 2014; 370: 599-609.
  • 3. Morton DL, Wen DR, Wong JH, et al. Technical details of intraoperative lymphatic mapping for early stage melanoma. Arch Surg 1992; 127: 392-399.
  • 4. Thomas JM. Where is the evidence base for benefits of sentinel node biopsy in melanoma? BMJ 2013; 346: f675.
  • 5. Torjesen I. Sentinel node biopsy for melanoma: unnecessary treatment? BMJ 2013; 346: e8645.
  • 6. Lens MB, Dawes M, Goodacre T, Newton-Bishop JA. Elective lymph node dissection in patients with melanoma: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch Surg 2002; 137: 458-461.
  • 7. Balch CM, Soong SJ, Bartolucci AA, et al. Efficacy of an elective regional lymph node dissection of 1 to 4 mm thick melanomas for patients 60 years of age and younger. Ann Surg 1996; 224: 255-263; discussion 63-66.
  • 8. Morton DL, Thompson JF, Cochran AJ, et al. Sentinel-node biopsy or nodal observation in melanoma. N Engl J Med 2006; 355: 1307-1317.
  • 9. Han D, Zager JS, Shyr Y, et al. Clinicopathologic predictors of sentinel lymph node metastasis in thin melanoma. J Clin Oncol 2013; 31: 4387-4393.
  • 10. Thomas JM. Prognostic false-positivity of the sentinel node in melanoma. Nat Clin Pract Oncol 2008; 5: 18-23.
  • 11. Morton RL, Howard K, Thompson JF. The cost-effectiveness of sentinel node biopsy in patients with intermediate thickness primary cutaneous melanoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2009; 16: 929-940.
  • 12. Wrightson WR, Wong SL, Edwards MJ, et al. Complications associated with sentinel lymph node biopsy for melanoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2003; 10: 676-680.
  • 13. Sanki A, Uren RF, Moncrieff M, et al. Targeted high-resolution ultrasound is not an effective substitute for sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with primary cutaneous melanoma. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27: 5614-5619.
  • 14. Voit C, Van Akkooi AC, Schäfer-Hesterberg G, et al. Ultrasound morphology criteria predict metastatic disease of the sentinel nodes in patients with melanoma. J Clin Oncol 2010; 28: 847-852.
  • 15. Murali R, Desilva C, Thompson JF, Scolyer RA. Non-Sentinel Node Risk Score (N-SNORE): a scoring system for accurately stratifying risk of non-sentinel node positivity in patients with cutaneous melanoma with positive sentinel lymph nodes. J Clin Oncol 2010; 28: 4441-4449.
  • 16. van der Ploeg AP, van Akkooi AC, Rutkowski P, et al. Prognosis in patients with sentinel node-positive melanoma is accurately defined by the combined Rotterdam tumor load and Dewar topography criteria. J Clin Oncol 2011; 29: 2206-2214.
  • 17. Australian Cancer Network Melanoma Guidelines Revision Working Party. Clinical practice guidelines for the management of melanoma in Australia and New Zealand. Sydney and Wellington: Cancer Council Australia, Australian Cancer Network and New Zealand Guidelines Group, 2008. http://www.cancer.org.au/content/pdf/HealthProfessionals/ClinicalGuidelines/ClinicalPracticeGuidelines-ManagementofMelanoma.pdf (accessed Aug 2014).
  • 18. van der Ploeg AP, van Akkooi AC, Haydu LE, et al. The prognostic significance of sentinel node tumour burden in melanoma patients: an international, multicenter study of 1539 sentinel node-positive melanoma patients. Eur J Cancer 2014; 50: 111-120.
  • 19. Faries MB, Thompson JF, Cochran A, et al. The impact on morbidity and length of stay of early versus delayed complete lymphadenectomy in melanoma: results of the Multicenter Selective Lymphadenectomy Trial (I). Ann Surg Oncol 2010; 17: 3324-3329.

Author

remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Comment
Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.