Maximising the commercial benefits of research
Author: Timothy M Dyke
Published online: 15 December 2014
It is reasonable to expect that the returns from research contribute economically to generate Australia's national wealth, given that Australian Government-funded research, such as through the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC), is supported by public taxes. Australia's national wealth is enhanced through translating research findings into new commercial products, companies or industries. This concept was at the centre of the Wills Review more than 15 years ago, and represents a virtuous cycle of investing in research to create knowledge and translating that knowledge to reap patient and economic benefits that lead to further investment.
NHMRC-funded research has contributed to commercial benefits including the cochlear implant, cervical cancer vaccine and sleep apnoea devices, in addition to other examples such as the research of David Anderson, who has created a simple blood test for HIV patient monitoring in developing countries (with funding from the NHMRC and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation).
At the NHMRC, we do much to foster collaborations between research and industry to boost the commercial returns of research. We have an industry stream as part of our Career Development Fellowships, supporting researchers who conduct research with strong industry links. While any research can result in commercial gains, we also have a specific research funding scheme — the Development Grants Scheme — to support research at proof-of-concept (for commercialisation) stage. A review of this scheme found that of the 40 completed projects studied, over half were under some form of possible commercial development and six had resulted in a product to market or were awaiting regulatory approval (http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/_files_nhmrc/file/media/media/rel12/nhmrc_development_grants_review_april_public_121122.pdf). In November 2014, we hosted a workshop to link our funded researchers with commercialisation advisors.
Improving patient care and human health will always be the main role of research, but we need to continue to support the commercial benefits of medical research in our country.
Getting on the Same Page: Why Australia Needs a National Maternity Early Warning System (MEWS) Chart
Briony A. Cutts, Lucy Bowyer, Nisha Khot, Sandra Lowe, Stefan C. Kane
Data for Equity: Can Linked Administrative Data Inform Pathways to More Equitable Child Health?
Sarah Gray, Shuaijun Guo, Meredith O'Connor, Elodie O'Connor, Katrina Williams, Hannah Badland, Susan Woolfenden, Josie Dickerson, Gerry Redmond, Marnie Downes, Sharon R. Goldfeld
Specialty College Selection: Why Change is Critical to Support a Future Rural Workforce
Matthew R. McGrail, Jenny May AM, Katherine Logan
The number of cancer‐related deaths that could be attributable to spatial disparities in survival in Australia, 2010–2019: a retrospective population‐based cohort study
Charlotte K Bainomugisa, Jessica Cameron, Paramita Dasgupta, Peter Baade
Differentiated and simplified oral HIV pre‐exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) models hold the key to virtually eliminating HIV transmission in Australia by 2030
Tyson Arapali, Sarah Warzywoda, Anthony K J Smith, Curtis Chan, Timothy R Broady, Erin Sullivan, Catherine MacPhail, Mohamed A Hammoud, Alexander Dowell‐Day, Benjamin R Bavinton
Non‐technical errors associated with deaths in surgical care, Australia, 2012–2019, by surgical specialty (Australian and New Zealand Audit of Surgical Mortality): a retrospective cohort study
Jesse Ey, Victoria Kollias, Octavia Lee, Kelly Hou, Matheesha Herath, John B North, Ellie Treloar, Suzanne Edwards, Martin Bruening, Adam J Wells, Guy J Maddern