Dear Minister, please save yourself from activity-based funding

Ian R Gough
Med J Aust 2014; 201 (1): 28. || doi: 10.5694/mja14.00437
Published online: 7 July 2014

To the Editor: There must be a better way of funding public hospitals than basing it on historical spending without analysis of activity or outcomes.

The opinion by Stoelwinder describes some of the politics and history of health funding in Australia, and argues against activity-based funding (ABF),1 suggesting that innovation is stifled in such a funding model and that “less intrusive population funding” would be preferable. The reasons for these assertions are unclear.

ABF has been the basis of funding of private hospitals in Australia for many years. The counting method is the diagnosis-related group (DRG) system that is well established and regularly revised and updated. It is transparent and accountable, and it is reasonable to apply the method to public hospitals also. When applied properly it has the potential to limit “gaming”.

Stoelwinder implies that outcome measures could be used, but these are controversial and challenging to develop and it is not yet practical to apply these as a currency for funding. The Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care and the Independent Hospital Pricing Authority (IHPA) are working jointly on options for incorporating safety and quality factors into ABF modelling, although implementation will take some time.

The funding of health care is complicated by politics. Whether or not Australia has a single funding model in the future — something that would be potentially more efficient than the complex federal system that we have currently — the work of the IHPA in developing robust methods underpinning ABF will be of enduring value. ABF is the most appropriate currently available method of funding hospitals.

  • Ian R Gough

  • University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD.


Competing interests:

I am the Chair of the Clinical Advisory Committee to the Independent Hospital Pricing Authority.

  • 1. Stoelwinder JU. Dear Minister, please save yourself from activity-based funding. Med J Aust 2014; 200: 200. <MJA full text>


remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.