Letters
Mental health Environmental health
Volume 200 - Issue 8

headspace - Australia's innovation in youth mental health: who are the clients and why are they presenting?

Authors:  Tracey A Davenport, Elizabeth M Scott and Daniel F Hermens

Med J Aust 2014; 200 (8): 452. || doi: 10.5694/mja14.00123
Published online: 5 May 2014
Comparing data between centres and nationally is complex but necessary
Download PDF (133 KB)
Share: Share on Blue Sky Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share by email

To the Editor: The study by Rickwood and colleagues1 of aggregated national data for young people attending headspace centres is most welcome, as we can now compare headspace with other pre-existing and current datasets. In 2001, we reported on mental health services provided during 46 515 consultations by 386 general practitioners (mean patient age, 46 years; 34% male).2 At the time, we noted that being aged under 25 years was associated with unmet need for both threshold (odds ratio, 1.34) and subthreshold mental disorders (odds ratio, 1.94–2.11).3 We concluded that young people with mental disorders were particularly poorly served by general practice.4 While these data informed subsequent development of youth-specific services, we did not specifically report data for people aged under 25 years. Of these participants, 3503/5868 self-reported a significant mental health problem. Consequently, we can compare directly our 2001 cohort2,3 with that of the new aggregated headspace cohort.1 At this stage, it would appear that only small differences are evident (2001 v 2013, respectively: male, 27% v 36%; born overseas, 12% v 7%; Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander descent, 5% v 8%; living in major cities, 65% v 57%; non-participation in employment or education, 36% v 29%; and no days out of role, 41% v 36%). In a dataset collected between 2007 and 2009 from two urban headspace sites managed by the University of Sydney, we noted a more substantial engagement of young men (of 1260 participants, 53% were male) and comparable disability characteristics to the two other datasets (non-participation in employment or education, 30%; no days out of role, 34%).5 In future reports from headspace nationally and locally, we look forward to presentation of other data that permit relevant comparative assessment and challenge us to design new services to meet known gaps.

Authors

  • Tracey A Davenport
  • Elizabeth M Scott
  • Daniel F Hermens
  • 1. Brain & Mind Research Institute, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW.

Correspondence: tracey.davenport@sydney.edu.au

Competing interests

Elizabeth Scott has received honoraria for educational seminars related to the clinical management of depressive disorders supported by Servier and Eli Lilly, and has participated in a Servier-sponsored multicentre trial of agomelatine for depressive disorders and on a national advisory board for desvenlafaxine, manufactured by Pfizer. Daniel Hermens has received honoraria for educational seminars from Janssen-Cilag, Eli Lilly and the New South Wales Institute of Psychiatry.

References

View this article on Wiley Online Library

More like this

Mental health Perspective 20 July 2026 Open Access

Reorienting Allied Health Into Community-Based Care for People Experiencing Trauma and Social Disadvantage

Simon Rosenbaum, Grace McKeon, Gulsah Kurt, Oscar Lederman, Kemi Wright, Sabuj Kanti Mistry, Jackie E. Curtis, Philip B. Ward, Zachary Steel, Hamish Fibbins, Rachel Morell, Melissa C. Eaton, Andrew Watkins, Ben Harris-Roxas, Brendan Goodger, Eleanor Beck, Megan Teychenne, Joseph Firth, Davy Vancampfort, David Burns, Russell Roberts, Tristan Favaloro, Danielle Weber, Rosanna Barbero, Vasili Maroulis, Melissa Holmes, Stefan Mackenzie, Chiara Mastrogiovanni, Afsana Anwar, Uzma Choudhry, Catherine Sherrington, Jane Currie, Thomas Gadsden, Scott Teasdale

View more