Is the researcher held to a higher standard than the clinician?
Human research ethics committees (HRECs) are now firmly entrenched in the research environment. Clinical research, including quality improvement activities, can only be performed and published with HREC approval. Clinical practice, however, is not subject to such approval, yet the risk of harm (to the individual and to society) from clinical practice may be considerable.1 Are researchers being held to a higher standard than clinicians? Has our concentration on ethical standards for clinical research led to an ethical blind spot for clinical practice?
The full article is accessible to AMA members and paid subscribers. Login to read more or purchase a subscription now.
Please note: institutional and Research4Life access to the MJA is now provided through Wiley Online Library.
- 1. Kilo CM, Larson EB. Exploring the harmful effects of health care. JAMA 2009; 302: 89-91.
- 2. Moon MR, Khin-Maung-Gyi F. The history and role of institutional review boards. Virtual Mentor 2009; 11: 311-321.
- 3. Schenker Y, Wang F, Selig SJ, et al. The impact of language barriers on documentation of informed consent at a hospital with on-site interpreter services. J Gen Intern Med 2007; 22 Suppl 2: 294-299.
- 4. Reitsma AM, Moreno JD. Ethical regulations for innovative surgery: the last frontier? J Am Coll Surg 2002; 194: 792-801.
- 5. Spaans AJ, van Hout JA, Bolder SB. High complication rate in the early experience of minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty by the direct anterior approach. Acta Orthop 2012; 83: 342-346.
- 6. Taylor R, Giles J. Cash interests taint drug advice. Nature 2005; 437: 1070-1071.
- 7. Appelbaum PS. Clarifying the ethics of clinical research: a path toward avoiding the therapeutic misconception. Am J Bioeth 2002; 2: 22-23.
- 8. Emanuel EJ, Wendler D, Grady C. What makes clinical research ethical? JAMA 2000; 283: 2701-2711.
- 9. Agich GJ. Ethics and innovation in medicine. J Med Ethics 2001; 27: 295-296.
- 10. Wilson CB. Adoption of new surgical technology. BMJ 2006; 332: 112-114.
No relevant disclosures.