Connect
MJA
MJA

Patient safety in hospitals — can we measure it?

Neville Board
Med J Aust 2013; 199 (8): . || doi: 10.5694/mja13.10626
Published online: 21 October 2013

Patient safety measurement tools all have limitations, so monitoring a range of data sources is recommended

Patient safety has been described as “the reduction of risk of unnecessary harm associated with healthcare to an acceptable minimum”.1 It is the hardest dimension of quality to measure. Three landmark reports — from the Harvard Medical Practice Study,2 the US Institute of Medicine3 and the Quality in Australian Health Care Study4 — quantified hospital adverse event rates derived from different methods. Safety researchers remain concerned that health care may not be getting safer5 and that robust measurement of safety in health care is still some way off.6


  • Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care, Sydney, NSW.



Competing interests:

I work full-time at the Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care. This article reflects my analysis, but has been approved for publication in the Medical Journal of Australia by the Commission Executive.

  • 1. Runciman W, Hibbert P, Thomson R, et al. Towards an international classification for patient safety: key concepts and terms. Int J Qual Health Care 2009; 21: 18-26.
  • 2. Brennan TA, Leape LL, Laird NM, et al. Incidence of adverse events and negligence in hospitalized patients — results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study I. N Engl J Med 1991; 324: 370-376.
  • 3. Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS. To err is human: building a safer health system. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2000.
  • 4. Wilson RM, Runciman WB, Gibberd RW, et al. The Quality in Australian Health Care Study. Med J Aust 1995; 163: 458-471.
  • 5. Shojania KG, Thomas EJ. Trends in adverse events over time: why are we not improving? BMJ Qual Saf 2013; 22: 273-277.
  • 6. Pham JC, Frick KD, Pronovost PJ. Why don’t we know whether care is safe? Am J Med Qual 2013; Mar 24 [Epub ahead of print].
  • 7. Trentino KM, Swain SG, Burrows SA, et al. Measuring the incidence of hospital-acquired complications and their effect on length of stay using CHADx. Med J Aust 2013; 199: 543-547. <MJA full text>
  • 8. Runciman WB, Edmonds MJ, Pradhan M. Setting priorities for patient safety. Qual Saf Health Care 2002; 11: 224-229.
  • 9. Classen DC, Resar R, Griffin F, et al. “Global trigger tool” shows that adverse events in hospitals may be ten times greater than previously measured. Health Aff (Millwood) 2011; 30: 581-589.
  • 10. Wakefield JG, Jorm CM. Patient safety — a balanced measurement framework. Aust Health Rev 2009; 33: 382-389.
  • 11. Vincent C, Burnett S, Carthey J. The measurement and monitoring of safety. London: Health Foundation, 2013.
  • 12. Weick KE, Sutcliff KM. Managing the unexpected: assuring high performance in an age of complexity. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2001.
  • 13. Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care. National Safety and Quality Health Service Standards. Sydney: ACSQHC, 2011.

Author

remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Comment
Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.