Hospital governance that prioritises waiting times or patient throughput does not adequately address health care quality
At the 2007 federal election, Kevin Rudd announced plans to reform the health system. The National Health and Hospitals Reform Commission (NHHRC) was established the following year to find solutions. In 2010, Rudd presented his response to the NHHRC’s report, proposing local hospital networks interfacing with primary health care, with governance in which health professionals would play a part.1 Regrettably, other forces with a focus primarily on external regulation of hospitals subsequently came to bear, and this became formulated as national policy by the Council of Australian Governments (COAG).2 But does the framework of the COAG agreement deliver what is needed?
Publication of your online response is subject to the Medical Journal of Australia's editorial discretion. You will be notified by email within five working days should your response be accepted.