MJA
MJA InSight
MJA Careers
Ethics and law

Direct-to-consumer genetic testing — where should we focus the policy debate?

Timothy Caulfield and Pascal Borry
Med J Aust 2013; 198 (9): 499-500.
doi:
10.5694/mja12.11024

What are the implications for health systems, children and informed public debate?

Timothy Caulfield, LLM, FRSC, FCAHS, Canada Research Chair in Health Law and Policy1
Pascal Borry, PhD, Professor of Bioethics2
1 Faculty of Law and School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
2 Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Article References: 
Reference Text: 
Trent RJ. Direct-to-consumer genetic testing — clinical considerations. Med J Aust 2013; 198: 1-3.
Reference Order: 
1
Reference Text: 
Hock KT, Christensen KD, Yashar BM, et al. Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: an assessment of genetic counselors’ knowledge and beliefs. Genet Med 2011; 13: 325-332.
Reference Order: 
2
PubMed ID: 
21233722
Reference Text: 
Borry P, Cornel MC, Howard HC. Where are you going, where have you been: a recent history of the direct-to-consumer genetic testing market. J Community Genet 2010; 1: 101-106.
Reference Order: 
3
PubMed ID: 
21475669
Reference Text: 
Borry P, van Hellemondt RE, Sprumont D, et al. Legislation on direct-to-consumer genetic testing in seven European countries. Eur J Hum Genet 2012; 20: 715-721.
Reference Order: 
4
PubMed ID: 
22274578
Reference Text: 
Caulfield T, McGuire AL. Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: perceptions, problems, and policy responses. Annu Rev Med 2012; 63: 23-33.
Reference Order: 
5
PubMed ID: 
21888511
Reference Text: 
Nicol D, Hagger M. Direct-to-consumer genetic testing — a regulatory nightmare? Med J Aust 2013; 198: 501-502.
Reference Order: 
6
Reference Text: 
Australian Law Reform Commission. Essentially yours: the protection of human genetic information in Australia. ALRC Report 96. 2003. http://www.alrc.gov.au/publications/report-96 (accessed Mar 2013).
Reference Order: 
7
Reference Text: 
Skirton H, Goldsmith L, Jackson L, O’Connor A. Direct to consumer genetic testing: a systematic review of position statements, policies and recommendations. Clin Genet 2012; 82: 210-218.
Reference Order: 
8
PubMed ID: 
22372614
Reference Text: 
Caulfield T, Condit C. Science and the sources of hype. Public Health Genomics 2012; 15: 209-217.
Reference Order: 
9
PubMed ID: 
22488464
Reference Text: 
James KM, Cowl CT, Tilburt JC, et al. Impact of direct-to-consumer predictive genomic testing on risk perception and worry among patients receiving routine care in a preventive health clinic. Mayo Clin Proc 2011; 86: 933-940.
Reference Order: 
10
PubMed ID: 
21964170
Reference Text: 
Bloss CS, Schork NJ, Topol EJ. Effect of direct-to-consumer genomewide profiling to assess disease risk. N Engl J Med 2011; 364: 524-534.
Reference Order: 
11
PubMed ID: 
21226570
Reference Text: 
Terhune C. Spending on genetic tests is forecast to rise sharply by 2021. Los Angeles Times 2012; 12 Mar. http://articles.latimes.com/2012/mar/12/business/la-fi-genetic-test-20120312 (accessed Mar 2013).
Reference Order: 
12
PubMed ID: 
21226570
Reference Text: 
Leighton JW, Valverde K, Bernhardt BA. The general public’s understanding and perception of direct-to-consumer genetic test results. Public Health Genomics 2012; 15: 11-21.
Reference Order: 
13
PubMed ID: 
21720148
Reference Text: 
Powell KP, Cogswell WA, Christianson CA, et al. Primary care physicians’ awareness, experience and opinions of direct-to-consumer genetic testing. J Genet Couns 2011; 21: 113-126.
Reference Order: 
14
PubMed ID: 
21769569
Reference Text: 
Borry P, Howard HC, Sénécal K, Avard D. Health-related direct-to-consumer genetic testing: a review of companies’ policies with regard to genetic testing in minors. Fam Cancer 2010; 9: 51-59.
Reference Order: 
15
PubMed ID: 
19488835
Reference Text: 
Human Genetics Society of Australasia. Pre symptomatic testing in children and young adults. Position statement. 2008. https://www.hgsa.org.au/website/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/2008PS02-Pre-symptomatic-predictive-testing-in-children-young-people.pdf (accessed Mar 2013).
Reference Order: 
16
Reference Text: 
Geransar R, Einsiedel E. Evaluating online direct-to-consumer marketing of genetic tests: informed choices or buyers beware? Genet Test 2008; 12: 13-23.
Reference Order: 
17
PubMed ID: 
18373401
Reference Text: 
US Government Federal Trade Commission. At-home genetic tests. Consumer information. 2013. http://www.consumer.ftc.gov/articles/0166-home-genetic-tests (accessed Mar 2013).
Reference Order: 
18

The full contents of this page are only available to subscribers.