Connect
MJA
MJA

Early obstetric simulators in Australia

Harry Owen and Damian J McDonald
Med J Aust 2013; 198 (8) || doi: 10.5694/mja13.10130
Published online: 20 May 2013

Simulation became important for obstetric training in the 18th and 19th centuries

The increased numbers of medical students in Australia, coming from a greater number of medical schools, have put pressure on the traditional obstetric education requirement for students to personally deliver babies under supervision. There is a real chance that students may “miss out” on this experience, and universities may need to resort to using simulation to give students those experiences and skills.

The full article is accessible to AMA
members and paid subscribers.
Login to MJA or subscribe now.


  • 1 Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Medicine, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA.
  • 2 Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, SA.
  • 3 Health and Medicine, Powerhouse Museum, Sydney, NSW.


Correspondence: harry.owen@flinders.edu.au

Competing interests:

No relevant disclosures.

  • 1. Owen H. Early use of simulation in medical education. Simul Healthc 2012; 7: 102-116.
  • 2. Azzaroli Puccetti ML. Human anatomy in wax during Florentine enlightenment. Ital J Anat Embryol 1997; 102: 77-89.
  • 3. Shelton DC. Man-midwifery history: 1730–1930. J Obstet Gynaecol 2012; 32: 718-723.
  • 4. Wadd W. Mems. Maxims and memoirs. London: Callow and Wilson, 1827.
  • 5. Bell B. The life, character and writings of William Hey of Leeds: a discourse delivered at the annual meeting of the Harveian society, Edinburgh, April 12, 1867. Edinb Med J 1867; 12 part 2: 1062-1065.
  • 6. Beardsley M, Bennett N. “Gratefull to providence”: the diary and accounts of Matthew Flinders, surgeon, apothecary and man-midwife, 1775–1802. Vol 1: 1775–1784. Lincoln: Lincoln Record Society, 2007.
  • 7. Elek SD. Semmelweis commemoration. Semmelweis and the Oath of Hippocrates. Proc R Soc Med 1996; 59: 346-352.
  • 8. Noakes TD, Borresen J, Hew-Butler T, et al. Semmelweis and the aetiology of puerperal sepsis 160 years on: an historical review. Epidemiol Infect 2008; 136: 1-9.
  • 9. Gillies D. Hempelian and Kuhnian approaches in the philosophy of medicine: the Semmelweis case. Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci 2005; 36: 159-181.
  • 10. Owen H, Pelosi MA 2nd. A historical examination of the Budin–Pinard Phantom: what can contemporary obstetrics education learn from simulators of the past? Acad Med 2013; Mar 21. [Epub ahead of print].
  • 11. Douglas D. The teaching of practical obstetrics. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Emp 1933; 40: 99-102.
  • 12. Parkinson J. The hospital pupil; or, an essay intended to facilitate the study of medicine and surgery. In four letters. . . . By James Parkinson. London: H. D. Symonds, 1800.
  • 13. Chair of midwifery. Testimonials in favour of James Y Simpson, MD. Edinburgh: Thomas Allan & Co, 1839.
  • 14. Reed CB. Operative obstetrics on the manikin for students and practitioners. Philadelphia: P. Blakiston’s Son & Co, 1931.

Author

remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Comment
Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.