An update of consensus guidelines for warfarin reversal

Huyen A Tran, Sanjeev D Chunilal, Paul L Harper, Huy Tran, Erica M Wood and Alex S Gallus, on behalf of the Australasian Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
Med J Aust 2013; 198 (4): 198-199. || doi: 10.5694/mja12.10614
Published online: 4 March 2013


Warfarin is effectively used in a wide range of thromboembolic disorders for primary and secondary prevention. Patients on long-term therapy have a risk of 1%–3% per year for haemorrhage leading to hospitalisation or death.1,2 Therefore, strategies to manage over-warfarinisation and warfarin during invasive procedures are important.3,4 Despite the associated bleeding risk, warfarin remains the most commonly prescribed anticoagulant in Australia and New Zealand. Common indications for the use of warfarin in the community include stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF), preventing thrombus formation in patients with mechanical heart valves (MHV), and treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE). For most warfarin indications, the target international normalised ratio (INR) is 2.0–3.0 (VTE and single MHV excluding mitral). For mechanical mitral valve or combined mitral and aortic valves, the target INR is 2.5–3.0.5 New anticoagulants such as oral direct factor Xa inhibitors and direct thrombin inhibitors are becoming available as alternatives to warfarin.6-8 However, it is likely that warfarin will continue to be widely used in the community among patients who are already stable on warfarin or have severe renal impairment (creatinine clearance, < 30 mL/min), and for anticoagulation indications for which these novel agents have not been evaluated, such as MHV.9,10

This update of the previous consensus guidelines11 is again on behalf of the Australasian Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ASTH) and offers advice on strategies to prevent over-anticoagulation, the principles of warfarin reversal, and bridging anticoagulation therapy in different clinical settings. In particular, the focus is on managing:

The recommendations draw on available evidence and the clinical experience of the panel of author–practitioners.

Guideline development

As Australian and New Zealand-based experts in the field of thromboembolic disorders, we were invited to join the panel leading guideline development. The process included reviewing up-to-date evidence and existing high-quality evidence-based international guidelines for warfarin reversal. We conducted a face-to-face meeting on 21 March 2011 at which specific questions and drafting of the guidelines were discussed. Further revisions were made by consensus via email. All six members of the panel are the authors of this article.

We based our recommendations on the body of evidence, with consideration of the strength of evidence, consistency across studies, likely clinical impact, and generalisability and applicability of study findings in the local setting.

Relevant clinical questions guided systematic review of the evidence. We followed the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) method to generate recommendations. The strength of recommendations, designated strong (1) or weak (2), is based on the quality of the body of evidence, which can be high (A), moderate (B) or low (C).12 For recommendations where the quality of evidence was not sufficient to allocate a grade, the term “good practice point” (GPP) indicates the recommendation is based on the consensus opinion of the ASTH writing panel (Box 1). Consensus recommendations were reached in an equitable manner. Agreement of all members of the expert panel was required in order to proceed with making the recommendation.

Potential conflicts of interest were declared and recorded. Funding for this update was provided by a restricted educational grant from CSL Bioplasma that was administered by the ASTH.

Bleeding complications of warfarin therapy

Bleeding is the most common complication of warfarin therapy and is related to the INR value. Although incremental rises in INR increase the risk of bleeding, most intracranial bleeds are in patients with an INR in the therapeutic range; they occur in 0.5%–1.0% of patients with AF per year.13,14 Bleeding risk is also related to patient factors including age, a prior bleeding history and specific comorbidities. Elderly patients are generally more sensitive to warfarin and need a lower mean daily dose.15,16 Bleeding risk is greatest in the first 3 months after starting warfarin. An occurrence suggests an underlying organ-specific lesion and should be appropriately investigated.1,17

Changes in concomitant medication potentially alter a patient’s response to warfarin anticoagulation and increase their risk of bleeding. Drugs that commonly alter warfarin metabolism include antibiotics, amiodarone, statins, anticonvulsants and some herbal medications, such as St John’s wort. Alcohol in small to moderate amounts probably has little effect on warfarin metabolism. Among heavy drinkers, however, associated factors such as increased falls, alcohol-induced gastritis, poor diet and poor compliance all increase the risk of bleeding. Bleeding prediction scores, such as HAS-BLED (hypertension, abnormal liver or renal function, stroke, bleeding history or predisposition, labile INR, elderly [> 65 years], alcohol or drugs concomitantly) for AF, may help to identify factors that can be modified to reduce the risk of warfarin-related bleeding but should not result in withholding of anticoagulation therapy.18

General principles for preventing high INR include careful therapeutic monitoring and adopting other precautionary measures that can minimise bleeding risk due to high INR (Box 2).19-22

Warfarin reversal
Vitamin K1 for reversal of warfarin-associated coagulopathy

Vitamin K1 is an effective antidote to the anticoagulant effect of warfarin. Despite this, data are lacking to show that its use improves outcome in life-threatening bleeds. Currently, phytomenadione is the only injectable formulation available in Australia and New Zealand. While intravenous or oral routes of administration can be used and are effective in reversing an INR that is raised because of warfarin therapy, the intravenous route achieves a more rapid response compared with oral administration, with an onset of action seen within 6–8 hours. However, both routes achieve a similar correction of INR by 24 hours.23

Vitamin K1 should not be administered by subcutaneous or intramuscular routes. Subcutaneous administration is no more effective than placebo, while intramuscular injection in an over-anticoagulated patient may lead to haematoma and bleeding, and its effect on reversal is unpredictable owing to variable absorption — it can be associated with a prolonged increase of vitamin K1 plasma levels, which may hinder re-anticoagulation.24,25 The major concern about intravenous vitamin K1 has been anaphylaxis. Although the absolute incidence is unknown, it is most likely rare. There is no convincing association between anaphylaxis and dose, concentration or rate of administration of vitamin K1 but the literature suggests that current formulations with mixed micelles of lecithin and glycol are safer than the previous preparations containing polyethylated castor oil.26

Prothrombin complex concentrate and fresh frozen plasma

Replacement is necessary to correct the low levels of factors II, VII, IX and X induced by warfarin. This can be achieved by using a prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) or fresh frozen plasma (FFP) (Box 3).

PCC are formulated with three factors (II, IX and X) or four factors (II, VII, IX and X). Advantages of PCC over FFP include rapid reconstitution into a small volume for infusion over 20–30 minutes, fast onset of action, no requirement to check a patient’s blood group, minimal risk of viral transmission due to pathogen reduction and inactivation steps during manufacturing,27 and reduced risk of other clinical adverse reactions such as transfusion-associated circulatory overload or transfusion-associated acute lung injury. The latter is due to circulating antihuman leukocyte antigen or antigranulocyte antibodies in plasma.28,29 However, PCC does contain small amounts of heparin and its use to reverse warfarin anticoagulation should be carefully considered in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.27

Prothrombinex-VF, a three-factor PCC, is the only product currently in routine use in Australia and New Zealand for warfarin reversal. Due to its low levels of factor VII, the Warfarin Reversal Consensus Guidelines published in 2004 recommended that it be supplemented with FFP.11 Since that time, there have been several reports of the successful use of a three-factor concentrate without addition of FFP.30-33 Prothrombinex-VF has been used successfully to electively reverse anticoagulation in patients on warfarin therapy with a stable INR, and achieved the target INR in over 90% of patients.30 However, this study included few patients (14%) with INR > 3.5 requiring normalisation of the INR. Patients with major or life-threatening bleeding or INR > 10.0 accompanied by high risk of bleeding are of great concern to clinicians, and the efficacy of Prothrombinex-VF when used alone in these patients has not been extensively evaluated. In such patients, supplementing factor VII by administering FFP should ensure optimal reversal of the anticoagulant effect of warfarin.

The previous Warfarin Reversal Consensus Guidelines recommended three-factor PCC (Prothrombinex-HT) be administered at a dose range of 25–50 IU/kg.11 The revised dosing recommendations for various clinical scenarios included in this update are based on panel consensus alone (ie, rather than gradable evidence). The suggested dose of Prothrombinex-VF for reversal of the anticoagulant effect of warfarin is based on initial and target INRs (Box 4).30

Prothrombinex-VF is able to completely reverse an excessive INR within 15 minutes, but the infused clotting factors have half-lives similar to endogenous clotting factors. Therefore, vitamin K1 5–10 mg should be given intravenously with the PCC to sustain the reversal effect.

FFP contains all coagulation factors present in whole blood but it is not a factor concentrate, and multiple units may be needed if FFP alone is used for warfarin reversal. In addition to the inherent risks of plasma use mentioned already, requirements for its use include the need to determine the patient’s blood group (or to use group AB plasma), appropriate facilities for frozen plasma storage and thawing, and the time taken for infusion. Therefore, FFP should not be used routinely to reverse warfarin anticoagulation; however, where PCC is unavailable and emergency reversal is required, FFP should be used, along with vitamin K1 to sustain the reversal effect.

Treating a patient with bleeding, regardless of INR

For patients on warfarin therapy with bleeding in whom the aim is to normalise the INR, vitamin K1 given intravenously is the preferred treatment because of its faster and predictable onset of action. For this indication, doses = 3 mg are ineffective. Consistent with other guidelines, we recommend a dose of 5–10 mg.25,34,35 Our recommendations for managing patients on warfarin therapy with bleeding are summarised in Box 5. For life-threatening (critical organ) and clinically significant bleeds, the consensus is to use the maximum dose of Prothrombinex-VF (with vitamin K1 and FFP) and the maximum amount of FFP when Prothrombinex-VF is unavailable.

Treating patients with high INR and no bleeding

Among patients with an elevated INR up to 10.0 who do not have bleeding or risk factors for major bleeding, it has been shown that oral administration of low-dose vitamin K1 does not lower the risk of bleeding compared with placebo and should not be used routinely.36 However, for patients with risk factors for bleeding, vitamin K1 1–2 mg orally or 0.5–1.0 mg intravenously should be considered. Risk factors for major bleeding include a major bleed within the previous 4 weeks, surgery within the previous 2 weeks, a platelet count less than 50 × 109/L, known liver disease or concurrent antiplatelet therapy. There are no randomised studies to guide management of patients whose INR exceeds 10.0 and who are not bleeding. A recent single-arm study involving outpatients with an INR greater than 10.0 reported a low rate of major bleeding when these patients received 2.5 mg of oral vitamin K1.37 Our recommendations for managing patients with high INR and no bleeding are summarised in Box 6. Many patients on warfarin are outpatients and information on individual patient bleeding risk is frequently not available to laboratory staff who are involved in reporting elevated INR results and attempting to communicate results to patients. In these settings, good communication between clinical and laboratory staff is essential.

Pre- and postoperative management of warfarin anticoagulation

When considering how to manage patients receiving warfarin who need surgery, it is important to consider the risk of thrombosis if warfarin is temporarily stopped, relative to the risk of bleeding if it is continued or modified. The perioperative thrombosis risk is determined by the indication for warfarin and the type of surgery, particularly with respect to postoperative VTE. Patients with MHV, AF with a history of stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA) or with multiple risk factors (CHADS2 score [congestive heart failure, hypertension, age = 75 years, diabetes, 1 point each; prior stroke or transient ischaemic attack, 2 points] > 2, including a history of stroke or TIA), or an episode of VTE within the previous 3 months can be considered as high risk. Box 7 shows our adapted version of a recently published empirical risk stratification scheme for arterial and venous thromboembolism.38

Bleeding risk is high with cardiac, neurosurgical, cancer-related, orthopaedic or urological operations, and also with certain otherwise minor procedures like colonic polypectomy.

Patients at high risk for arterial and venous thromboembolism should be considered for bridging anticoagulation with therapeutic low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) or an infusion of unfractionated heparin.39 Bridging may include a heparin before and/or after surgery. It should be noted that quality evidence is lacking to show that bridging with heparin reduces arterial thromboembolism in patients with AF but is associated with increased bleeding (see below). Bridging is usually not needed in patients with low-risk AF (CHADS2 score 0–2 and no history of TIA or stroke), or VTE occurring more than 3 months before surgery.

Bridging with a heparin is associated with an added risk of surgical bleeding that varies depending on the type of surgery (20% with major surgery, compared with 0.7% with minor surgery).40 The risk of bleeding should be considered in the context of the severe consequences of thromboembolic stroke (death in 40% and severe disability in 30% of patients).

Traditionally, warfarin has been stopped 5 days before a major operation. Surgery can proceed safely if the INR is < 1.5 on the day of surgery. To avoid cancellations because the INR is above this level, the INR can be checked on the day before surgery and vitamin K1 can be administered if needed. In patients who are given heparin before surgery, an LMWH is usually started when the INR is < 2.0 (typically on the third morning after the last warfarin dose) and continued until 24 hours before surgery; some guidelines recommend halving the last dose of LMWH before surgical procedures associated with a high bleeding risk.41

The above method can be labour intensive. In patients with a stable INR of 2.0–3.0 during the preceding 4 weeks, vitamin K1 3 mg given intravenously on the evening (12–18 hours) before surgery has been shown to be effective in achieving a preoperative INR of < 1.5 in 94%, with few episodes of major bleeding related to surgery and low rates of warfarin resistance when restarting the drug.42 Both methods using vitamin K1 to reverse warfarin anticoagulation often require hospital in the home services or a general practitioner to administer the subcutaneous LMWH or intravenous vitamin K1, and can result in higher rates of cancellation of surgery if the INR is > 1.5 on the day of surgery.

For patients who need urgent surgery while receiving warfarin therapy, three-factor PCC can effectively reverse the anticoagulant effect.30,31 PCC should not be used routinely to enable elective surgery however, as vitamin K1 is effective and less costly.

Many dental, dermatological or ophthalmological procedures are associated with a low bleeding risk. Patients with a low bleeding risk need not stop warfarin.

Bleeding risk can be minimised after major surgery by adjusting the time when anticoagulant is resumed, according to the anticipated surgical bleeding risk and the extent of intraoperative or immediate postoperative bleeding. This means that therapeutic LMWH is delayed for 48–72 hours or substituted with prophylactic LMWH in patients having major surgery with a high bleeding risk.43 Bleeding risk is low after minor procedures if therapeutic LMWH is started about 24 hours after surgery. Warfarin can be restarted on the evening of surgery at the previous maintenance dose if there is adequate surgical haemostasis.

The strategies that can be used to manage patients on long-term warfarin therapy during surgery and other invasive procedures are summarised in Box 8. These strategies are not associated with a delay in re-establishing a therapeutic INR when resuming warfarin after surgery.

3 Characteristics of Prothrombinex-VF* and fresh frozen plasma



Fresh frozen plasma


Prepared from plasma collected from voluntary donors. Sterile freeze-dried powder containing coagulation factors II, IX and X and low levels of factor VII

Separated and frozen within 18 hours of collection from volunteer donors. Contains all coagulation factors


Patients showing signs of thrombosis or disseminated intravascular coagulation

Do not use when coagulopathy can be corrected more effectively with specific therapy, such as vitamin K1, cryoprecipitate or other specific factor concentrates


Available in vials containing 500 IU of factor II, IX and X to be reconstituted in 20 mL of water for injections. Each vial also contains 25 IU of antithrombin and 192 IU of heparin

Available in Australia in units of 250–334 mL and in New Zealand as 180–300 mL (typically 240–275 mL). May be stored in monitored blood refrigerator at 2–6°C for up to 5 days once thawed, and relabelled “thawed plasma” in accordance with Australian and New Zealand Society of Blood Transfusion Guidelines. Thawed plasma has levels of factors II, VII, IX and X adequate for warfarin reversal


From relevant blood service or hospital blood bank

From relevant blood service or hospital blood bank

Considerations for use

No need to consider ABO blood group

Available in all ABO blood groups and should be ABO-group compatible with patient’s red cells (or use AB plasma)


Known allergies to prothrombin complex concentrates

Most common adverse events — allergic reactions and volume overload. Potential for transfusion-related acute lung injury and other transfusion reactions, including transmission of infections


Predisposition to venous thrombosis, disseminated intravascular coagulation and myocardial infarction


Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia


* CSL Bioplasma. For more comprehensive information on these products, refer to approved product information27 and blood service data.28,29 Thrombotic complications of prothrombin complex concentrates appear to be rare. Since 1993 thrombotic episodes with Prothrombinex-VF or its predecessor, Prothrombinex-HT, have been rarely reported to CSL Bioplasma.27,28

5 Management of patients on warfarin therapy with bleeding*

Clinical setting

Recommendations and levels of evidence

INR = 1.5 with life-threatening (critical organ) bleeding

Cease warfarin therapy and administer:

INR = 2.0 with clinically significant bleeding (not life-threatening)

Any INR with minor bleeding

INR = international normalised ratio. IV = intravenously. * Indication for warfarin therapy should be reviewed; if clinically appropriate, consider permanent cessation. Level of evidence in parentheses in bold. Details, Box 1. Includes intracranial bleeding. § Consider administering a Prothrombinex-VF dose less than 50.0 IU/kg when INR 1.5–1.9. Recent major bleed (within previous 4 weeks) or major surgery (within previous 2 weeks), thrombocytopenia (platelet count, < 50 × 109/L), known liver disease or concurrent antiplatelet therapy.

6 Management of patients on warfarin therapy with high INR and no bleeding

Clinical setting

Recommendations and levels of evidence*

INR higher than the therapeutic range but < 4.5 and no bleeding

Lower or omit the next dose of warfarin

Resume therapy at a lower warfarin dose when the INR approaches therapeutic range

INR 4.5–10.0 and no bleeding

INR > 10.0 and no bleeding

INR = international normalised ratio. IV = intravenously. * Level of evidence in parentheses in bold; details, Box 1. Recommendations with no evidence level are standard practice and not based on gradable evidence. Recent major bleed (within previous 4 weeks) or major surgery (within previous 2 weeks), thrombocytopenia (platelet count, < 50 × 109/L), known liver disease or concurrent antiplatelet therapy. Extrapolated from oral vitamin K data in absence of IV data.

8 Management of patients on long-term warfarin therapy undergoing invasive procedures


Thrombosis risk

Before surgery

After surgery


Withhold warfarin 4–5 days before surgery (1C)

Check INR day before surgery: If INR 2–3, administer 3 mg vitamin K1 IV

Day of surgery:


Option 1

aPTT = activated partial thromboplastin time. FFP = fresh frozen plasma. INR = international normalised ratio. LMWH = low molecular weight heparin. UFH = unfractionated heparin. * Level of evidence given in parentheses in bold. For details, see Box 1. Recommendations with no evidence level are standard practice and not based on gradable evidence.

Provenance: Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Huyen A Tran1,2
  • Sanjeev D Chunilal2
  • Paul L Harper3
  • Huy Tran4
  • Erica M Wood2,5,6
  • Alex S Gallus7,8
  • on behalf of the Australasian Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis

  • 1 Clinical Haematology, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, VIC.
  • 2 Haematology, Monash Medical Centre, Melbourne, VIC.
  • 3 Clinical Haematology, Palmerston North Hospital, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
  • 4 Haematology, Dorevitch Pathology, Melbourne, VIC.
  • 5 Diagnostic Haematology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC.
  • 6 Monash University, Melbourne, VIC.
  • 7 Haematology, SA Pathology at Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, SA.
  • 8 Flinders University, Adelaide, SA.


Competing interests:

A restricted educational grant from CSL Bioplasma that was administered by the ASTH enabled the Warfarin Reversal Consensus Group (WRCG) to travel to meet, develop and write these guidelines. No members of the WRCG received honoraria. Paul Harper is a Director of INR Online, an online warfarin management system, and a member of the Bayer HealthCare rivaroxaban New Zealand advisory committee. Erica Wood is a member of the Transfusion Outcomes Research Collaborative, which operates the Massive Transfusion and Critical Bleeding Registry through Monash University. CSL Limited, the manufacturers of Prothrombinex-VF, have provided financial support to this registry.

  • 1. Linkins LA, Choi PT, Douketis JD. Clinical impact of bleeding in patients taking oral anticoagulant therapy for venous thromboembolism: a meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 2003; 139: 893-900.
  • 2. Kearon C, Akl EA, Comerota AJ, et al. Antithrombotic therapy for VTE disease: antithrombotic therapy and prevention of thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest 2012;141 (2 Suppl): e419S-e494S.
  • 3. Gallus AS, Baker RI, Chong BH, et al. Consensus guidelines for warfarin therapy. Recommendations from the Australasian Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis. Med J Aust 2000; 172: 600-605. <MJA full text>
  • 4. Schulman S, Beyth RJ, Kearon C, Levine MN. Hemorrhagic complications of anticoagulant and thrombolytic treatment: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition). Chest 2008; 133 (6 Suppl): 257S-298S.
  • 5. Whitlock RP, Sun JC, Fremes SE, et al. Antithrombotic and thrombolytic therapy for valvular disease: antithrombotic therapy and prevention of thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest 141 (2 Suppl): e576S-600S.
  • 6. Connolly SJ, Ezekowitz MD, Yusuf S, et al; RE-LY Steering Committee and Investigators. Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2009; 361: 1139-1151.
  • 7. Granger CB, Alexander JH, McMurray JJ, et al; ARISTOTLE Committees and Investigators. Apixaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2011; 365: 981-992.
  • 8. Patel MR, Mahaffey KW, Garg J, et al; ROCKET AF Investigators. Rivaroxaban versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2011; 365: 883-891.
  • 9. Eerenberg ES, Kamphuisen PW, Sijpkens MK, et al. Reversal of rivaroxaban and dabigatran by prothrombin complex concentrate: a randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover study in healthy subjects. Circulation 2011; 124: 1573-1579.
  • 10. Eikelboom JW, Wallentin L, Connolly SJ, et al. Risk of bleeding with 2 doses of dabigatran compared with warfarin in older and younger patients with atrial fibrillation: an analysis of the randomized evaluation of long-term anticoagulant therapy (RE-LY) trial. Circulation 2011; 123: 2363-2372.
  • 11. Baker RI, Coughlin PB, Gallus AS, et al. Warfarin Reversal Consensus Group. Warfarin reversal: consensus guidelines, on behalf of the Australasian Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis. Med J Aust 2004; 181: 492-497. <MJA full text>
  • 12. Guyatt GH, Norris SL, Schulman S, et al. Methodology for the development of antithrombotic therapy and prevention of thrombosis guidelines: antithrombotic therapy and prevention of thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest 2012; 141 (2 Suppl): 53S-70S.
  • 13. Palareti G, Leali N, Coccheri S, et al. Bleeding complications of oral anticoagulant treatment: an inception-cohort, prospective collaborative study (ISCOAT). Italian Study on Complications of Oral Anticoagulant Therapy. Lancet 1996; 348: 423-428.
  • 14. A randomized trial of anticoagulants versus aspirin after cerebral ischemia of presumed arterial origin. The Stroke Prevention in Reversible Ischemia Trial (SPIRIT) Study Group. Ann Neurol 1997; 42: 857-865.
  • 15. White RH, Beyth RJ, Zhou H, Romano PS. Major bleeding after hospitalization for deep-venous thrombosis. Am J Med 1999; 107: 414-424.
  • 16. van der Meer FJ, Rosendaal FR, Vandenbroucke JP, Briët E. Bleeding complications in oral anticoagulant therapy. An analysis of risk factors. Arch Intern Med 1993; 153: 1557-1562.
  • 17. Landefeld CS, Beyth RJ. Anticoagulant-related bleeding: clinical epidemiology, prediction, and prevention. Am J Med 1993; 95: 315-328.
  • 18. Camm AJ, Kirchhof P, Lip GY, et al. Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation: the Task Force for the Management of Atrial Fibrillation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 2010; 31: 2369-2429.
  • 19. Harrison L, Johnston M, Massicotte MP, et al. Comparison of 5-mg and 10-mg loading doses in initiation of warfarin therapy. Ann Intern Med 1997; 126: 133-136.
  • 20. Crowther MA, Ginsberg JB, Kearon C, et al. A randomized trial comparing 5-mg and 10-mg warfarin loading doses. Arch Intern Med 1999; 159: 46-48.
  • 21. Kovacs MJ, Rodger M, Anderson DR, et al. Comparison of 10-mg and 5-mg warfarin initiation nomograms together with low-molecular-weight heparin for outpatient treatment of acute venous thromboembolism. A randomized, double-blind, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 2003; 138: 714-719.
  • 22. Holbrook A, Schulman S, Witt DM, et al. Evidence-based management of anticoagulant therapy: antithrombotic therapy and prevention of thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest 2012; 141 (2 Suppl): e152S-184S.
  • 23. Watson HG, Baglin T, Laidlaw SL, et al. A comparison of the efficacy and rate of response to oral and intravenous vitamin K in reversal of over-anticoagulation with warfarin. Br J Haematol 2001; 115: 145-149.
  • 24. Soedirman JR, De Bruijn EA, Maes RA, et al. Pharmacokinetics and tolerance of intravenous and intramuscular phylloquinone (vitamin K1) mixed micelles formulation. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1996; 41: 517-523.
  • 25. Dezee KJ, Shimeall WT, Douglas KM, et al. Treatment of excessive anticoagulation with phytonadione (vitamin K): a meta-analysis. Arch Intern Med 2006; 166: 391-397.
  • 26. Fiore LD, Scola MA, Cantillon CE, Brophy MT. Anaphylactoid reactions to vitamin K. J Thromb Thrombolysis 2001; 11: 175-183.
  • 27. CSL Bioplasma. Prothrombinex-VF product information. Melbourne: CSL Limited, 2011.
  • 28. Australian Red Cross Blood Service. Blood component information: circular of information 2012. (accessed Dec 2012).
  • 29. New Zealand Blood. Frozen plama components. Blood component datasheet: plasma fresh frozen leucocyte depleted. 2010. (accessed Dec 2012).
  • 30. Tran H, Collecutt M, Whitehead S, Salem HH. Prothrombin complex concentrates used alone in urgent reversal of warfarin anticoagulation. Intern Med J 2011; 41: 337-343.
  • 31. Chiu D, Grigg M, Levi E. Operating on patients with warfarin: simpler alternative approach [letter]. ANZ J Surg 2009; 79: 409-410.
  • 32. Crawford JH, Augustson BM. Prothrombinex use for the reversal of warfarin: is fresh frozen plasma needed [letter]? Med J Aust 2006; 184: 365-366. <MJA full text>
  • 33. Imberti D, Barillari G, Biasioli C, et al. Emergency reversal of anticoagulation with a three-factor prothrombin complex concentrate in patients with intracranial haemorrhage. Blood Transfus 2011; 9: 148-155.
  • 34. Keeling D, Baglin T, Tait C, et al; British Committee for Standards in Haematology. Guidelines on oral anticoagulation with warfarin - fourth edition. Br J Haematol 2011; 154: 311-324.
  • 35. Ansell J, Hirsh J, Hylek E, et al. Pharmacology and management of the vitamin K antagonists: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition). Chest 2008; 133 (6 Suppl): 160S-198S.
  • 36. Crowther MA, Ageno W, Garcia D, et al. Oral vitamin K versus placebo to correct excessive anticoagulation in patients receiving warfarin: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 2009; 150: 293-300.
  • 37. Crowther MA, Garcia D, Ageno W, et al. Oral vitamin K effectively treats international normalised ratio (INR) values in excess of 10. Results of a prospective cohort study. Thromb Haemost 2010; 104: 118-121.
  • 38. Douketis JD. Perioperative management of patients who are receiving warfarin therapy: an evidence-based and practical approach. Blood 2011; 117: 5044-5049.
  • 39. Spyropoulos AC, Turpie AG, Dunn AS, et al; REGIMEN Investigators. Clinical outcomes with unfractionated heparin or low-molecular-weight heparin as bridging therapy in patients on long-term oral anticoagulants: the REGIMEN registry. J Thromb Haemost 2006; 4: 1246-1252.
  • 40. Dunn AS, Spyropoulos AC, Turpie AG. Bridging therapy in patients on long-term oral anticoagulants who require surgery: the Prospective Peri-operative Enoxaparin Cohort Trial (PROSPECT). J Thromb Haemost 2007; 5: 2211-2218.
  • 41. Douketis JD, Berger PB, Dunn AS, et al. The perioperative management of antithrombotic therapy: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition). Chest 2008; 133 (6 Suppl): 299S-339S.
  • 42. Burbury KL, Milner A, Snooks B, et al. Short-term warfarin reversal for elective surgery--using low-dose intravenous vitamin K: safe, reliable and convenient*. Br J Haematol 2011; 154: 626-634.
  • 43. Kovacs MJ, Kearon C, Rodger M, et al. Single-arm study of bridging therapy with low-molecular-weight heparin for patients at risk of arterial embolism who require temporary interruption of warfarin. Circulation 2004; 110: 1658-1663.


remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.