Futile treatment: the ethicist’s perspective

Dominic J C Wilkinson
Med J Aust 2013; 198 (4): . || doi: 10.5694/mja12.10778
Published online: 4 March 2013

We need to pay attention to the reasons why treatment is judged to be futile

When doctors are confronted with making treatment decisions in the context of a terminally ill patient, the way forward is often difficult and confused. Bringing an ethics perspective to bear on the problem can help to resolve what the essential issues are, in turn enabling a clearer path to appropriate decisions by the people who ought to be making those decisions. In many cases where further treatment of a patient may be thought to be futile, such as John’s case, described by Koczwara,1 the central ethical question is whether treatment is medically inappropriate or futile, and whether, as a consequence, it may be withdrawn or withheld against the wishes of his family.

  • Department of Neonatal Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA.


I thank Professor Julian Savulescu for his valuable assistance in analysing this topic and developing the figure.

Competing interests:

No relevant disclosures.

  • 1. Koczwara B. What is futile and who decides? The clinician’s dilemma. Med J Aust 2013; 198; 221-222.
  • 2. Wilkinson DJC, Savulescu J. Knowing when to stop: futility in the ICU. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2011; 24: 160-165.
  • 3. American College of Emergency Physicians. Non-beneficial (“futile”) emergency medical interventions. 2008. (accessed Oct 2010).
  • 4. McCabe MS, Storm C. When doctors and patients disagree about medical futility. J Oncol Pract 2008; 4: 207-209.
  • 5. Truog RD, Brett AS, Frader J. The problem with futility. N Engl J Med 1992; 326: 1560-1564.
  • 6. Chwang E. Futility clarified. J Law Med Ethics 2009; 37: 487-495, 396.
  • 7. Niederman M, Berger J. The delivery of futile care is harmful to other patients. Crit Care Med 2010; 38 (10 Suppl): S518-S522.
  • 8. Veatch RM. Abandoning informed consent. Hastings Cent Rep 1995; 25: 5-12.
  • 9. DeGrazia D. Value theory and the best interests standard. Bioethics 1995; 9: 50-61.
  • 10. Jecker NS, Schneiderman LJ. When families request that “everything possible” be done. J Med Philos 1995; 20: 145-163.
  • 11. Rothchild E. Family dynamics in decisions to withhold or withdraw treatment. In: Steinberg MD, Youngner SJ, editors. End-of-life decisions: a psychosocial perspective. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press, 1998.
  • 12. Sprung CL, Woodcock T, Sjokvist P, et al. Reasons, considerations, difficulties and documentation of end-of-life decisions in European intensive care units: the ETHICUS Study. Intensive Care Med 2008; 34: 271-277.
  • 13. Mill JS. On liberty. New York: Bobbs-Merrill, 1956.
  • 14. Feinberg J. The moral limits of the criminal law: harm to others. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984.
  • 15. Larkin GL, Copes WS, Nathanson BH, et al. Pre-resuscitation factors associated with mortality in 49,130 cases of in-hospital cardiac arrest: a report from the National Registry for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation. Resuscitation 2010; 81: 302-311.
  • 16. Truog RD. Is it always wrong to perform futile CPR? N Engl J Med 2010; 362: 477-479.
  • 17. Wilkinson D, Savulescu J. A costly separation between withholding and withdrawing treatment in intensive care. Bioethics Jul 5 2012. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2012.01981.x [epub ahead of print].
  • 18. Daniels N. Justice, health, and healthcare. Am J Bioeth 2001; 1: 2-16.
  • 19. Orentlicher D. Rationing health care: its a matter of the health care system’s structure. Ann Health Law 2010; 19: 449.


remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.