Volume 198 - Issue 11

Gestational diabetes needs to be managed

Authors:  Michael C d’Emden, Narelle D Fagermo, Amanda J Love and Karin M C Lust

Med J Aust 2013; 198 (11): 595-596. || doi: 10.5694/mja13.10433
Published online: 17 June 2013
To the Editor: McIntyre and Oats1 suggest that Australian medical practitioners should adopt the new International Association of the Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) diagnostic criteria for the management of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM),2 mainly because of the findings of the Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome (HAPO) study.3 If adopted, a significant number of women will be diagnosed with GDM if their only blood ...

To the Editor: McIntyre and Oats1 suggest that Australian medical practitioners should adopt the new International Association of the Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) diagnostic criteria for the management of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM),2 mainly because of the findings of the Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome (HAPO) study.3 If adopted, a significant number of women will be diagnosed with GDM if their only blood glucose level (BGL) abnormality is a fasting BGL of 5.1–5.4 mmol/L. The quoted studies do not provide outcome data to confirm benefit at these levels.4,5 In addition, women currently diagnosed with GDM on the basis of a 2-hour BGL of more than 8.0 mmol/L but below the new IADPSG level of 8.5 mmol/L2 will no longer meet the criteria. But outcome data show a benefit of management at these levels.4 Also, the US study on treatment for mild GDM used a 100 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT)5 with a 2-hour BGL cut-off that approximates 8.0 mmol/L on a 75 g OGTT.6 Thus the two quoted outcome studies demonstrate benefit of treatment at BGLs that will no longer be accepted for the diagnosis of GDM.

The authors imply that the new criteria will not increase resource demand. The main abnormality in the quoted intervention studies was the postprandial BGLs, which are amenable to lifestyle change.4,5 The fasting BGL is less responsive, at least in the short term. It is likely that a significant number of women will require insulin based on these lower fasting BGLs. Consequently, a woman with a fasting BGL of 5.1 mmol/L will be diagnosed with GDM, and will potentially be treated with insulin to achieve the recommended fasting BGL of 5.0 mmol/L or less.2 Will a 0.1 mmol/L reduction in fasting BGL confer any clinical benefit?

The current guidelines7 are supported by outcome data demonstrating benefit from intervention. The HAPO study is hypothesis generating.3 What is required is an outcome study that randomly assigns women whose only abnormality on their OGTT is a fasting BGL of 5.1–5.4 mmol/L. Until that study is completed, the current guidelines should continue to be used.


Authors


Competing interests


References