Letters
Women's health
Volume 198 - Issue 1

An intensive smoking intervention for pregnant Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women: a randomised controlled trial

Authors:  Sandra J Eades, Rob W Sanson-Fisher and Katie Panaretto

Med J Aust 2013; 198 (1): 23-24. || doi: 10.5694/mja12.11298
Published online: 21 January 2013
In reply: Although our trial1 did not decrease quit rates with an intensive intervention, health professionals should continue to deliver appropriate intensive smoking interventions to pregnant Indigenous women.2 Guidelines advise the exercise of caution with the use of nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) in pregnancy,3 given the lack of trial data supporting its use.4 A recent trial of NRT in pregnancy found similar rates of adverse ...
Download PDF (93 KB)
Share: Share on Blue Sky Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share by email

In reply: Although our trial1 did not decrease quit rates with an intensive intervention, health professionals should continue to deliver appropriate intensive smoking interventions to pregnant Indigenous women.2 Guidelines advise the exercise of caution with the use of nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) in pregnancy,3 given the lack of trial data supporting its use.4 A recent trial of NRT in pregnancy found similar rates of adverse pregnancy and birth outcomes among women who used NRT and those who did not.5 Our study recommended NRT after at least two attempts to quit without NRT. NRT gum was prescribed by the treating doctors, with a preference for intermittent doses rather than continuous low doses through the use of NRT patches, in line with current guidelines.3 Women were provided with a week’s supply of NRT but, for reasons that were not clear, none returned for repeat supplies. The frequency with which NRT was prescribed, provided and used by women was not recorded with sufficient accuracy to allow interpretation. No definite conclusions about the efficacy of NRT can be drawn from our study and further research is necessary.

Authors

  • Sandra J Eades1
  • Rob W Sanson-Fisher2
  • Katie Panaretto3
  • 1. University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW.
  • 2. University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW.
  • 3. Queensland Aboriginal and Islander Health Council, Brisbane, QLD.

Correspondence: Sandra.eades@sydney.edu.au

Competing interests

No relevant disclosures.

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge our coauthors in the original study: Mark Wenitong, Catherine D’Este, Conor Gilligan and Jessica Stewart.

References

View this article on Wiley Online Library

More like this

Women's health Perspective 1 September 2026 Open Access

Forty Years in the Making: Reporting on the Co-Creation of a National Roadmap for Birthing on Country Services for the Best Start to Life

Res McCalman, Anneka J. Bowman, Roianne West, Kristie Watego, Jyai Allen, Claire Clack, Sue Kildea, Sue Kruske, Melanie Briggs, Cleone Wellington, Rebecca Coddington, Yu Gao, Isabella Garti, Sascha Kowalenko, Sarah Ireland, Catherine Austin, John D. Boffa, Marah Prior, Kelsie Kahl, Bettina Chaseling, Sarah Khaw, Emily Armstrong, Donna Hartz, Yvette Roe

View more