“Click first, care second” photography
Author: Rod Phillips
Published online: 21 January 2013
To the Editor: Burns and Belton1 are to be commended for their reminder that informed consent is required before taking patient photographs. They warn that many clinicians are unaware of copyright issues, fail to meet required hospital standards for clinical photographs and/or store images in unacceptable ways. These are important messages.
Interestingly, their article did not mention the core reason for medical photography. They state that the best-case scenarios for use of medical photographs are in teaching or telemedicine. Discussion about medical photography should begin from the premise that clinical photographs are often an important part of the clinical record. Capturing an image and storing it with the patient file is part of appropriately documenting the physical signs at that presentation. There may be reasons for not taking photographs, but the basic tenet of keeping accurate medical records remains fundamental to good medical practice. I see patients where photographs taken by a clinician at a previous consultation are in the patient file. Having this record can make my assessment more certain and, in some cases, allows initiation of treatment which otherwise would be delayed for some weeks.
It is important that we address the concerns that Burns and Belton raise about secondary uses of medical photographs. At the same time, we should consider how technological advances in photography are increasing opportunities for medical images to routinely be part of the patient record.
Competing interests
References
- Burns K, Belton S. “Click first, care second” photography. Med J Aust 2012; 197: 265. 0_DDHJBAID
Seven Vessel Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection and Concurrent Transient Global Amnesia After an Emotional Trigger
Michael J. Stewart, Tom R. Sutherland
Seven Vessel Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection and Concurrent Transient Global Amnesia After an Emotional Trigger
Virginia Barbour
Research Priority Setting Is Not Research: A Call for Ethical Clarity in Australia
Bec Jenkinson, Gordon McGurk, Jonathan Quicke, Janelle Bowden, Nadine E. Foster
Organ Donation After Oral Ingestion of a Voluntary Assisted Dying Substance
Joanne Kantianis, Helen I. Opdam, Rohit L. D'Costa
Equity, Diversity and Inclusion From the Start: Reforming Australia's Research Infrastructure for Inclusive Participation
Danielle M. Muscat, Kirsten J. McCaffery, Heather L. Shepherd, Marguerite Tracy
A Match Made in Health Care: Can Ethics and Governance Better Support Impactful Implementation Research?
Natalie Taylor, Zhicheng Li, Cathelijne van Kemenade, Jackie Curtis, Patrick Bolton