Legal clarification of “loss of chance of a better outcome” in Australia

Padraic J Grattan-Smith
Med J Aust 2012; 197 (5): . || doi: 10.5694/mja12.10463
Published online: 3 September 2012

To the Editor: Bhatia and Tibballs1 claim that the High Court ruling in Tabet v Gett that removed “loss of chance” as a possible course of action by patients is “to the advantage of doctors”. They end with a note of regret and hope that this means of litigation might be revived.

  • Padraic J Grattan-Smith

  • Southern Neurology, Sydney, NSW.


Competing interests:

No relevant disclosures.


remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.