Designing incentives for good-quality hospital care

Stephen J Duckett
Med J Aust 2012; 197 (10): . || doi: 10.5694/mja12.11264
Published online: 19 November 2012

In reply: Evans and colleagues present their critique of my proposition1 to use incentives based on adverse events recorded in routine data as an alternative — it is not. Routine data, audits and registries all have a place in the quest to improve safety of care in hospitals.

  • Grattan Institute, Melbourne, VIC.


Competing interests:

No relevant disclosures.

  • 1. Duckett SJ. Designing incentives for good-quality hospital care. Med J Aust 2012; 196: 678-679. <MJA full text>
  • 2. Lee GM, Hartmann CW, et al. Perceived impact of the Medicare policy to adjust payment for health care-associated infections. Am J Infect Control 2012; 40: 314-319.
  • 3. McHugh MK, Van Dyke, et al. Medicare’s payment policy for hospital-acquired conditions. Med Care Res Rev 2011; 68: 667-682.


remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.