Clinical pathways and guidelines: a plea for professional independence
Author: Paul M McGurgan
Published online: 21 May 2012
To the Editor: Clinical pathways and guidelines are the inevitable consequence of evidence-based medicine and, in general, have been a force for good in terms of patient care. However, the experiences of Nanan et al1 and Dietz and Stokes,2 and my own experience of working with countless exasperated colleagues in clinical practice, suggest that the pendulum may have swung too far towards uniformity of care.
The uniformity promoted by clinical pathways and guidelines is an attempt to counter the truism that variation is the enemy of quality. However, all health care professionals need to appreciate the importance of two key concepts in medicine — one old and one modern. The first is the value of gnosis, the Greek philosophical term for knowledge gained through experience, such as in clinical practice. The second is the modern definition of evidence-based medicine, which is the integration of the best research evidence with clinical expertise and patient values.3
The problem with evidence-based medicine is that too often the emphasis is on the evidence rather than the clinical expertise or the patient’s unique perspective. As an antidote, I propose paraphrasing the words of Sir Douglas Bader4 as a foreword for every guideline or clinical pathway document: “Guidelines are for the guidance of the wise and the blind obedience of fools”.
Competing interests
References
- Nanan RK, Poulton AS, Champion BL. Clinical pathways: a departure from the art of medicine. Med J Aust 2012; 196: 96. 0_CBBJGCHE
- Dietz HP, Stokes BJ. A plea for professional independence. Med J Aust 2012; 196: 104-105. 0_i1142858
- Sackett DL, Straus SE, Richardson WS, et al. Evidence-based medicine: how to practice and teach EBM. 2nd ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 2000. 0_i1142860
- Douglas Bader Foundation. Some quotes from Sir Douglas Bader. http://douglasbaderfoundation. com/2010/10/15/some-quotes-from-sir-douglas-bader/ (accessed Mar 2012).
Shifting focus to adolescent wellbeing and inclusive participation in the digital age
Allyson R Todd, Elena Wang, Stephanie R Partridge
The clinical presentation, investigation, and management of women diagnosed with endometriosis in Australian general practices, 2011–2021: an open cohort study
Danielle Mazza, Kailash Thapaliya, Sharinne B Crawford, Alissia Hui, Maryam Moradi, Luke E Grzeskowiak
The impact of the Breast Screen NSW transition from film to digital mammography, 2002–2016: a linked population health data analysis
Rachel Farber, Nehmat Houssami, Katy J L Bell
Non‐technical errors associated with deaths in surgical care, Australia, 2012–2019, by surgical specialty (Australian and New Zealand Audit of Surgical Mortality): a retrospective cohort study
Jesse Ey, Victoria Kollias, Octavia Lee, Kelly Hou, Matheesha Herath, John B North, Ellie Treloar, Suzanne Edwards, Martin Bruening, Adam J Wells, Guy J Maddern
The CURE Asthma roadmap
Gary P Anderson, Anthony Flynn, Phil G Bardin, John D Blakey, Shyamali C Dharmage, Paul Foster, Peter G Gibson, Adam Jaffe, Alan James, Christine R Jenkins, Sundram Sivamalai, Peter D Sly, Guy B Marks, Vanessa M McDonald, Judy Wetttenhall
Evidence from Australian cohort studies about asthma trajectories and transitions across the life course: a narrative review
Caroline Lodge, Xin Dai, Ingrid A. Laing, Michael P Menden, Anthony Flynn, Gary P Anderson, Sarath Ranganathan, Shyamali C Dharmage